Qrevo Curv by Roborock vs iRobot Roomba Max 705 by iRobot

Qrevo Curv delivers 18,500 Pa suction, outperforming Roomba Max 705's capabilities which are rated up to 175x the Roomba 600 series in spot mode, particularly on hard floors and with pet hair where Roomba scores 9.0 in tests. Roomba Max 705 uses dual anti-tangle rubber brushes and Carpet Boost for effective debris pickup from edges and carpets, scoring 6.0 on carpets but 9.0 on pet hair. Both handle mixed surfaces well, though Qrevo's higher suction aids tougher messes.[3][4]

Qrevo Curv employs LiDAR, RGB camera, and 3D structured light sensors for precise AI obstacle avoidance, enabling efficient mapping in cluttered homes. Roomba Max 705 combines ClearView Pro LiDAR with PrecisionVision AI for SLAM-based navigation, achieving 92% avoidance on carpets and always avoiding pet waste, with 80% on bare floors. Both systems excel in low-light conditions and room-by-room mapping, but Roomba's camera-based recognition edges out in hazard detection like cords.[1][4]

Qrevo Curv features a 6400 mAh battery offering up to 240 minutes runtime and 3-hour recharge, suitable for larger areas. Roomba Max 705 provides 5000 mAh with 103-193 minutes runtime and 203-minute recharge, supporting recharge-and-resume. Qrevo's larger capacity yields longer sessions, while both maintain 3-5 year service life estimates.[3]

Qrevo Curv offers AI automation and app control via proprietary OS for scheduling and zone cleaning. Roomba Max 705 integrates Roomba Home App with voice control across Alexa, Siri, and Google Assistant, plus smart pathing and cycle controls. Roomba provides more voice ecosystem compatibility, while both enable autonomous operation effectively.

Qrevo Curv's slimmer 7.98 cm height and 3.9 kg weight aid navigation under low furniture, with cliff and bump sensors. Roomba Max 705 at 10.4 cm height and 3.4 kg uses rubber brushes minimizing tangles and auto-empty dock, but lacks mop features. Qrevo suits threshold-heavy homes; Roomba emphasizes durable brushes for pet hair.

Qrevo Curv excels in homes with pets, mixed floors, and high thresholds due to its sensors and low profile. Roomba Max 705 targets large homes and premium cleaning with strong carpet performance and smart integration. Both manage residential cleaning effectively, with choices depending on floor types.

Qrevo Curv at USD 900-1,200 offers higher suction and mopping potential at a potentially lower entry price. Roomba Max 705 at USD 1,100-1,200 provides proven iRobot ecosystem and vacuum focus. Value tilts to Qrevo for versatility, Roomba for brand reliability.

Qrevo Curv handles pet hair via strong suction and structured light avoidance, while Roomba Max 705 scores 9.0 in pet hair pickup with anti-tangle brushes and always avoids pet waste. Roomba's dual brushes maintain contact on various floors, and its dirt detection aids repeat cleaning. For pet-owning households, Roomba Max 705 is the better choice due to specialized pet performance.

Qrevo Curv's 240-minute runtime and fast recharge cover extensive areas efficiently. Roomba Max 705 offers up to 193 minutes with reliable recharge-resume and precise mapping for big spaces. Roomba Max 705 suits large homes better with its navigation consistency and automation.