Compare Star1 by Robot Era & Phoenix by Sanctuary AI

Compare Star1 and Phoenix. Detailed analysis of speed, sensors, AI capabilities, and navigation.

Star1 by Robot Era positions itself in the humanoid robotics market through its focus on native general-purpose embodied intelligence, incubated by Tsinghua University and backed by significant funding. It differentiates with high-speed mobility reaching 6 m/s (21.6 km/h), enabling applications in rugged outdoor environments like security patrols and emergency response. The robot's end-to-end neural network approach for mobility and manipulation, combined with 55 degrees of freedom and robust joint torque, supports industrial tasks such as 3C assembly and automotive logistics.

Phoenix by Sanctuary AI targets commercial deployment in industrial and service sectors, leveraging its seventh-generation advancements and partnerships like Microsoft Azure for AI training. It stands out with the proprietary Carbon AI control system, mimicking human brain subsystems for memory, sight, sound, and touch to enable human-like task execution. Key differentiators include best-in-class hand dexterity with over 20 DOF hydraulic actuation and tactile sensing, suited for precise manipulation in automation, healthcare, and research.

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Phoenix

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Star1 measures 171 x 55 x 50 cm and weighs 65 kg, featuring 55 degrees of freedom and 400 N·m joint torque for robust manipulation. Phoenix is slightly shorter at 170 x 55 x 60 cm but heavier at 70 kg, with advanced hydraulic hands offering 20+ DOF for superior dexterity compared to electric actuators in competitors. Both employ similar builds for humanoid form factors, though Star1 emphasizes high-speed structural integrity for dynamic tasks while Phoenix prioritizes precision grip strength.

Trade-off: +1 each
Phoenix

Mobility & Navigation

Trade-off

Star1 achieves a top speed of 6 m/s (21.6 km/h), supporting agile movement across terrains via LiDAR, SLAM, and visual odometry. Phoenix maxes at 5 km/h (1.34 m/s) walking speed, also using LiDAR, SLAM, and visual odometry for navigation. Star1's higher velocity suits fast logistics and outdoor use, whereas Phoenix focuses on stable, deliberate mobility in structured industrial settings.

Trade-off: +1 each
Phoenix

Sensors & Perception

Trade-off

Star1 integrates RGB cameras, depth cameras, stereo cameras, tactile sensors, IMU, gyroscope, and force sensors for comprehensive environmental awareness. Phoenix includes RGB cameras, embedded micro cameras, tactile sensors with haptic feedback, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors in hands and arms, plus temperature sensors. Phoenix's haptic and temperature sensing enhances fine manipulation, while Star1's broader camera suite aids high-speed perception.

Trade-off: +1 each
Phoenix

AI Capabilities

Trade-off

Star1 uses AI automation with end-to-end neural networks for mobility and manipulation, supported by a Linux-based ROS-compatible system. Phoenix employs the Carbon AI control system with Large Behavior Models for human-like cognition, trained on Azure and enabling rapid task learning in under 24 hours. Both offer remote control options, but Phoenix's architecture emphasizes generalization across physical tasks.

Trade-off: +1 each
Phoenix

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

Both robots claim a 5-year battery lifespan, though real-world tests suggest Phoenix operates approximately 4 hours per charge in active use. Star1's design supports extended outdoor operations without specified charge limits in provided data. This parity positions them for long-term deployments, pending validation of endurance claims.

Trade-off: +1 each
Phoenix

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

Star1 excels in 3C assembly, automotive logistics, inspection, customer service, and warehousing, with potential for security and emergency response. Phoenix targets industrial automation, data capture, customer service, healthcare assistance, logistics handling, and R&D. Overlapping in service and logistics, Star1 leans toward speed-demanding tasks while Phoenix suits dexterity-focused applications.

Trade-off: +1 each
Phoenix

Software Ecosystem

Trade-off

Star1 runs on Linux-based software that is ROS compatible with a proprietary SDK for development. Phoenix uses Linux-based ROS-compatible software integrated with its proprietary AI framework and Carbon system. Both ecosystems support secondary development, with Phoenix benefiting from Azure cloud training partnerships.

Trade-off: +1 each
Phoenix

Safety Features

Trade-off

Star1 includes emergency stop, obstacle detection, and collision avoidance. Phoenix features emergency stop, collision avoidance, and proximity sensors. These measures ensure safe operation in human-shared spaces for both robots.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

8

Star1

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

8

Phoenix

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationStar1Phoenix
Carrying Capacity20 kg per arm12.5 kg per arm (Estimated)
Deadlift Capacity25 kg25 kg maximum (two-hand payload)
Degrees of Freedom55 DoF75 DOF including head, arms, hands, legs, torso
Autonomy LevelSemi-autonomous to fully autonomous (L3 level)Semi-autonomous with full autonomous task execution capability and teleoperation support
PriceUSD 100,000 – 200,000 (industrial/research-grade pricing varies based on configuration)$100,000 - $200,000 (Estimated)
Weight65 kg (143 lbs)70 kg
Max Speed3.6 m/s (12.98 km/h) (Max running); 1.5 m/s (Standard walking)5 km/h (1.34 m/s) max walking speed
Runtime7 hours4 hours on full charge
Battery Pack2.1 kWh3.5 kWh
Dimensions171 x 55 x 50 (cm)170 x 55 x 60 cm

Showing 10 of 54 specifications

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.