The AgiBot A2 by AgiBot is a humanoid robot positioned for industrial automation, warehouse logistics, customer reception, research assistance, precision assembly, and public interaction. It features variants like Standard and Max, with dimensions of 175 cm x 60 cm x 40 cm and weights from 55 kg to 69 kg. Key differentiators include HIMUS 3D-SLAM navigation, VectorFlux planning, WorkGPT AI system, and advanced sensors such as visual-based fingertip sensors.
The Martian by UniX AI is a humanoid robot designed for logistics, manufacturing, household assistance, research, and service industries. It offers a compact build at 160 x 50 x 30 dimensions and 50 kg weight, with a higher speed of 10.8 km/h. Its differentiators encompass ROS2 software ecosystem, broad sensor suite including temperature sensors, and emphasis on autonomous learned behaviors.
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
AgiBot A2 measures 175 cm x 60 cm x 40 cm and weighs 55 kg in standard configuration, up to 69 kg for A2-Max, providing a taller and potentially more robust frame for industrial tasks. Martian is smaller at 160 x 50 x 30 and lighter at 50 kg, suiting agile applications in household and service environments. Both employ humanoid forms but differ in scale, with AgiBot A2 supporting variant-specific optimizations.

Mobility & Navigation
AgiBot A2 achieves 7 km/h speed using HIMUS 3D-SLAM and VectorFlux planning algorithms for precise navigation. Martian reaches 10.8 km/h with indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping, prioritizing higher velocity. AgiBot A2 includes manual operation alongside AI control, while Martian focuses on autonomous and learned behaviors.

Sensors & Perception
AgiBot A2 integrates microphone array, LiDAR, RGB-D cameras, stereo cameras, visual-based fingertip sensors, force/torque sensors, IMU, and gyroscope for comprehensive perception. Martian features RGB cameras, depth cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, and temperature sensors. Martian adds ultrasonic and temperature sensing, while AgiBot A2 emphasizes fingertip and stereo vision.

AI Capabilities
AgiBot A2 employs WorkGPT AI system and AimRT framework for AI automation, supporting multimodal processing. Martian uses ROS2, proprietary software, Python, C++, and APIs for autonomous operation and learned behaviors. AgiBot A2 adds manual control options, contrasting Martian's focus on scalable software deployment.

Battery & Power Efficiency
AgiBot A2 offers an expected 5-year battery lifecycle with industrial lithium-ion technology. Martian provides 3-5 years of battery life. Both target long-term operation, with AgiBot A2 specifying a consistent 5-year expectation.

Use-Case Suitability
AgiBot A2 targets industrial automation, warehouse logistics, customer reception, research assistance, precision assembly, and public interaction. Martian suits logistics, manufacturing, household assistance, research, and service industries. AgiBot A2 leans toward precision and public roles, while Martian extends to household tasks.

Software Ecosystem
AgiBot A2 utilizes AimRT communication framework and WorkGPT AI system. Martian leverages ROS2, proprietary solutions, Python, C++, and APIs for flexibility. Martian emphasizes open development tools, differing from AgiBot A2's proprietary stack.

Pricing & Value
AgiBot A2 prices range from USD 100,000 to 190,000 based on configuration. Martian costs $100,000 to $150,000. Overlap exists at the lower end, with AgiBot A2 offering variant flexibility potentially justifying higher configurations.

Safety Features
AgiBot A2 includes obstacle detection, collision avoidance, and emergency stop. Martian provides force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative mode. Both ensure basic safety, with Martian adding force limiting and collaboration.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
7
AgiBot A2
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
11
Martian
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | AgiBot A2 | Martian |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying Capacity | 15 kg per arm | 30 kg |
| Deadlift Capacity | 20 kg (based on arm payload and typical humanoid lifting capabilities) | 50 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 49+ Active DoF (Total body) | 23 |
| Autonomy Level | Level 4 autonomous mobility with teleoperation fallback | Fully autonomous, semi-autonomous |
| Price | USD 100,000 – 190,000 (Based on the configuration) | $100,000 - $150,000 |
| Weight | 55 kg (A2 Standard); up to 69 kg for the A2-Max variant | 50 kg |
| Max Speed | 7 km/h (1.94 m/s) | 10.8 km/h(3 m/s) |
| Runtime | 2 hours | 4 hours |
| Battery Pack | 700 Wh (Standard); A2-W variant features a 2000 Wh (2 kWh) high-capacity pack | 9000mAh |
| Dimensions | 175 cm x 60 cm x 40 cm | 160 x 50 x 30 |
Showing 10 of 54 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


AgiBot A2 vs LUS2
Compare AgiBot A2 and LUS2. Detailed analysis of navigation, sensors, and battery life.


Alpha vs Martian
Alpha or Martian? Compare specs, speed, sensors, navigation, and battery performance.


Zerith Z1 vs Martian
Zerith Z1 or Martian? Compare specs, sensors, navigation, battery, and mobility performance.


Martian vs AgiBot A2 Ultra
Head-to-head: Martian vs AgiBot A2 Ultra. Explore differences in navigation, battery, sensors, mobility, and software.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.