The Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo positions itself as an affordable robotic vacuum for Indian households seeking comprehensive floor care. It features LiDAR 3.0 navigation for precise mapping, powerful suction up to 9000Pa, and wet mopping capabilities, making it suitable for multi-surface homes. Key differentiators include a 5000mAh battery offering 5-hour runtime covering 3000 sq. ft., HEPA filtration for allergens, and app-based controls with voice compatibility, setting it apart in value-driven markets.
The Freo X Plus Robotic Vacuum Cleaner by Narwal targets budget-conscious users needing reliable daily cleaning in residential spaces. Its LiDAR-based 3D mapping and tri-laser obstacle avoidance provide structured navigation, paired with app and voice assistant controls. Standout aspects include a slightly heavier build at 4.3 kg and comparable speed, emphasizing consistent performance for standard homes without specialized mopping or extended runtime claims.
Detailed Analysis
Cleaning Performance (Real-World Use)
Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo delivers superior cleaning with up to 9000Pa hypersuction, wet mopping across 15 floor types, and HEPA H13 filtration capturing allergens effectively for pet owners and allergy sufferers. Freo X Plus focuses on dry vacuuming with tri-laser detection but lacks detailed mopping or filtration specs. In real-world scenarios, Nuo handles diverse dirt in Indian homes better due to its 3S mopping and pet-pro system.
Navigation & Mapping Accuracy
Both use LiDAR technology, but Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo's LiDAR 3.0 enables quick 5-minute home mapping and 360° coverage with anti-collision, cliff, and bump sensors. Freo X Plus employs LiDAR-based 3D mapping with tri-laser and side/front sensors for obstacle avoidance. Nuo's advanced sensor suite offers more precise path planning in complex layouts.
Battery Life & Runtime
Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo provides up to 5 hours of runtime from its 5000mAh battery, covering 3000 sq. ft., with auto-recharge and resume functionality. Freo X Plus claims a typical 5-year lithium-ion lifespan but lacks specific runtime data. Nuo excels for uninterrupted large-area cleaning sessions.
Smart Features & App Experience
Nuo supports Smart Life app for scheduling, no-go zones, spot cleaning, and voice control via Alexa/Google Assistant. Freo X Plus offers app control plus broader voice integration with Google Home, Alexa, and Siri. Both provide manual options, but Nuo's custom CleanAssist adds targeted flexibility.
Design, Build & Maintenance
At 34.5x34.5x9.6 cm and 3.5 kg, Nuo's slimmer, lighter design aids under-furniture access and easy handling. Freo X Plus measures 355x350x107 mm at 4.3 kg, potentially less agile in tight spaces. Both emphasize low maintenance with self-docking, though Nuo's quiet operation and HEPA filters simplify upkeep.
Use-Case Suitability
Nuo suits large homes, pet owners, and allergy households with mopping, pet hair handling, and wide coverage. Freo X Plus fits general residential floor cleaning without specialized adaptations. Nuo's versatility covers more daily scenarios effectively.
Safety Features
Nuo includes anti-collision, anti-drop, cliff, and bump sensors for secure operation. Freo X Plus relies on tri-laser obstacle detection and collision avoidance. Both prevent accidents, but Nuo's multi-sensor array provides broader protection.
Which robot is better for large homes?
Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo covers 3000 sq. ft. in 5 hours with precise LiDAR mapping and auto-resume, outperforming Freo X Plus which lacks runtime specifics. Freo handles standard spaces adequately but may require more recharges in expansive areas. For large homes, Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo is the better choice.
Which robot is better for homes with pets?
Nuo's ultimate pet-pro system, hypersuction, and HEPA filtration excel at pet hair and mess removal without disturbance. Freo X Plus offers general avoidance but no pet-specific features. Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo suits pet owners more effectively.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
11
Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
7
Freo X Plus Robotic Vacuum Cleaner
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo | Freo X Plus Robotic Vacuum Cleaner |
|---|---|---|
| Suction Power | 5000 Pa | 7800 Pa |
| Dust Bin Capacity | 0.5 liters (Estimated typical capacity for this size) | - |
| Water Tank Capacity | 200 ml (Estimated typical for combined vacuum-mop robots) | - |
| Self-Emptying System | No | - |
| Cleaning Modes | Auto, spot, edge, scheduled, custom zone cleaning | - |
| Cleaning Area | Up to 3000 sq. ft. per charge | - |
| Filter Type | HEPA H13 grade filter | Information not specified |
| Brush Type | Main brush roll (combination of rubber and bristles), dual side brushes | - |
| Mopping Capability | Yes, with 3S Mopping Technology and adjustable water flow | - |
| Surface Recognition | Yes, automatic surface detection and suction adjustment | Suitable for various floor types |
Showing 10 of 59 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution
ECOVACS DEEBOT N20 PRO vs Freo X Plus Robotic Vacuum Cleaner
Which robot vacuum wins? ECOVACS DEEBOT N20 PRO vs Freo X Plus compared for pet hair handling, navigation accuracy, battery runtime, and home suitability.
Laseron S9 Pro+ vs Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo
Laseron S9 Pro+ or Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo? Compare for pet hair handling, navigation accuracy, app control, and value in daily home cleaning.
ECOVACS DEEBOT N20 PRO vs Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo
Which robot wins? ECOVACS DEEBOT N20 PRO vs Eureka Forbes SmartClean Nuo compared across navigation, sensors, battery, and price.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.