ALICE 4 by AEI Robot vs Q5 by Robot Era: Review

Which robot wins? ALICE 4 vs Q5 compared across sensors, speed, battery, and navigation.

ALICE 4
AEI Robot

ALICE 4

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$50,000 - $100,000 (Estimated)
vs
Q5
Robot Era

Q5

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$100,000 - $150,000 (Estimated)

ALICE 4 by AEI Robot targets research, pick-and-place workflows, and service applications with an estimated price of $50,000 - $100,000. Its lighter 45 kg weight and compact 160 x 50 x 30 dimensions enhance portability compared to Q5. Key differentiators include additional depth cameras and force sensors (FSR) for precise manipulation and VR teleoperation support.

Q5 by Robot Era positions for elder care, child interaction, retail service, logistics, and hospitality at $100,000 - $150,000 estimated price. It offers higher speed of 1.5 m/s and a sturdier 70 kg build with 165 x 50 x 52 dimensions. Differentiators encompass broader use cases like hospitality alongside a 4-year battery life.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationALICE 4Q5
Price$50,000 - $100,000 (Estimated)$100,000 - $150,000 (Estimated)
Weight45 kg70 kg
Max Speed0.8 m/s1.5 m/s
Runtime8 hours>4 hours
Battery Pack5000mAh50000mAh
Dimensions160 x 50 x 30165 x 50 x 52
SensorsRGB cameras, depth cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors (FSR), temperature sensorsRGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, temperature sensors
Charging Time4 hours4 hours (Estimated)
Navigation SystemIndoor SLAM, visual SLAM, LiDAR mappingIndoor SLAM, visual SLAM, LiDAR mapping
Control MethodTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviorsTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviors

Showing 10 of 50 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Q5

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

ALICE 4 measures 160 x 50 x 30 with 45 kg weight, providing a lighter and more compact humanoid form than Q5's 165 x 50 x 52 and 70 kg. The reduced weight of ALICE 4 supports easier handling in research settings. Q5's increased dimensions and mass suggest greater stability for service tasks.

Trade-off: +1 each
Q5

Mobility & Navigation

Trade-off

Both robots utilize indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping for navigation. ALICE 4 reaches 0.8 m/s speed, while Q5 achieves 1.5 m/s for faster movement. Q5's higher speed suits dynamic environments like retail and logistics.

ALICE 4: +2
ALICE 4

Sensors & Perception

Winner 🏆 ALICE 4

ALICE 4 includes RGB cameras, depth cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors (FSR), and temperature sensors. Q5 features RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, and temperature sensors, lacking depth cameras and FSR. ALICE 4's extra sensors enable enhanced depth perception and force feedback.

Trade-off: +1 each
Q5

AI Capabilities

Trade-off

Control methods match with teleoperation, autonomous operation, and learned behaviors on both robots. ALICE 4 supports imitation learning and VR teleoperation for skill acquisition. Q5 aligns in AI-driven behaviors suitable for interaction-focused applications.

Trade-off: +1 each
Q5

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

ALICE 4 provides a 3-year battery life, compared to Q5's 4-year duration. Both offer long-term power without specified runtime differences here. Q5's extended battery supports prolonged deployments in hospitality and care.

Trade-off: +1 each
Q5

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

ALICE 4 excels in pick-and-place workflows, research, service applications, VR teleoperation, and imitation learning. Q5 covers elder care, child interaction, retail service, research labs, logistics, and hospitality. Q5 provides wider versatility for human-centric services.

Trade-off: +1 each
Q5

Pricing & Value

Trade-off

ALICE 4's $50,000 - $100,000 range is lower than Q5's $100,000 - $150,000. Lower cost positions ALICE 4 for budget-conscious research users. Q5 justifies higher price with speed and use-case breadth.

Trade-off: +1 each
Q5

Safety Features

Trade-off

Both include force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative mode. Identical safety protocols ensure human-robot interaction compliance. No differences noted in safety implementations.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

9

ALICE 4

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

7

Q5

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.