The Q5 by Robot Era is a humanoid robot priced at $50,000 - $75,000, positioned for versatile applications in elder care, child interaction, retail service, research labs, logistics, and hospitality. Its dimensions measure 165 x 50 x 52 cm with a weight of 70 kg, enabling agile indoor mobility at 1.5 m/s. Key differentiators include a comprehensive sensor suite with RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, and temperature sensors, alongside support for teleoperation, autonomous control, and learned behaviors using ROS2, proprietary OS, Python, C++, and APIs.
The ELIXIS W by Addverb Technologies, priced at USD 11,000-16,000, targets industrial environments such as intralogistics, warehouse material handling, package sorting, industrial inspection, and collaborative assembly. It stands at 175.0 x 60.0 x 50.0 cm and weighs 75 kg, achieving a speed of 5.4 km/h (1.5 m/s). Distinctive features encompass 4x stereo depth cameras, 1x 3D LiDAR, 2x 9-axis IMU, dual-encoders per joint, optional tactile finger sensors, and a two-layer safety system with ROS2, proprietary stack, and Python APIs.
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
Q5 measures 165 x 50 x 52 cm and weighs 70 kg, offering a slightly more compact frame compared to ELIXIS W's 175.0 x 60.0 x 50.0 cm and 75 kg build. Both robots adopt humanoid designs suited for human environments, with ELIXIS W providing a taller standing height of 1750 mm for industrial tasks. Their weight difference of 5 kg reflects minor variations in structural materials and components.

Mobility & Navigation
Both robots achieve a speed of 1.5 m/s, with ELIXIS W specified as 5.4 km/h. Navigation capabilities overlap in Indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping. Q5 and ELIXIS W support equivalent mobility for indoor and structured environments.

Sensors & Perception
Q5 integrates RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, and temperature sensors. ELIXIS W features 4x stereo depth cameras, 1x 3D LiDAR, 2x 9-axis IMU, dual-encoders per joint, and optional tactile finger sensors. ELIXIS W emphasizes joint-specific encoders and optional tactile sensing, while Q5 includes broader environmental sensors like ultrasonic and temperature.

AI Capabilities
Control modes are identical across both robots, supporting teleoperation, autonomous operation, and learned behaviors. Neither provides explicit details on AI models or training frameworks. Shared capabilities indicate comparable AI foundations for task execution.

Battery & Power Efficiency
Q5 offers a 4-year battery life, while ELIXIS W provides 3–5 years based on battery health cycles. Both deliver multi-year operational endurance suitable for continuous use. The ranges overlap, with ELIXIS W showing potential variability tied to cycles.

Use-Case Suitability
Q5 targets elder care, child interaction, retail service, research labs, logistics, and hospitality, emphasizing human-centric service roles. ELIXIS W focuses on intralogistics, industrial inspection, warehouse material handling, package sorting, and collaborative assembly. Q5 suits softer service environments, whereas ELIXIS W aligns with industrial and warehouse operations.

Software Ecosystem
Both utilize ROS2 as a core framework, with Q5 adding proprietary OS, C++, and APIs alongside Python. ELIXIS W employs a proprietary stack and Python APIs. Q5 provides broader language support including C++.

Pricing & Value
Q5 is priced at $50,000 - $75,000, significantly higher than ELIXIS W's USD 11,000-16,000 range. The price gap reflects differences in targeted markets and feature sets. ELIXIS W offers lower entry cost for industrial deployment.

Safety Features
Both include force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative mode. ELIXIS W adds a two-layer safety system. Core safety measures align closely.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
9
Q5
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
9
ELIXIS W
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Q5 | ELIXIS W |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying Capacity | 10 | - |
| Deadlift Capacity | 20 | - |
| Autonomy Level | Semi-autonomous, teleoperated | - |
| Price | $50,000 - $75,000 | USD 11000-16000 |
| Weight | 70 kg | 75 kg |
| Max Speed | 1.5 m/s | 5.4 km/h (1.5 m/s) |
| Runtime | >4 hours | 1.5 – 2 hours (Continuous industrial operation) |
| Battery Pack | 50000mAh | High-capacity Lithium-ion (Approx. 2 kWh) |
| Dimensions | 165 x 50 x 52 | 175.0 x 60.0 x 50.0 cm (Standing height 1750 mm) |
| Sensors | RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, temperature sensors | 4x Stereo Depth Cameras, 1x 3D LiDAR, 2x 9-axis IMU, Dual-encoders (per joint), Tactile Finger Sensors (Optional) |
Showing 10 of 53 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


CloiD vs ELIXIS W
In-depth comparison of CloiD by LG Electronics and ELIXIS W by Addverb Technologies. Analyze sensors, navigation, and battery performance.


Optimus vs ELIXIS W
Which robot wins? Optimus vs ELIXIS W compared across sensors, battery, navigation, speed, and price for industrial applications.


Q5 vs Reflex Humanoid
Which robot wins? Q5 vs Reflex Humanoid compared across sensors, navigation, battery, speed, and price.


Q5 vs HMND 01 Alpha Wheeled
Q5 or HMND 01 Alpha Wheeled? Compare specs, speed, sensors, navigation, and battery for service vs industrial performance.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.