L7 by Robot Era vs Q5 by Robot Era

Both robots share humanoid, biomimetic designs from the same manufacturer, but the L7 is described as a full-size bipedal platform with a taller stature (171 × 50 × 40 cm) and lower listed weight (65 kg), suggesting emphasis on dynamic gait and dual-arm manipulation, while the Q5's dimensions (165 × 50 × 52 cm) and higher weight (70 kg) indicate a more compact, possibly more stable service configuration. Materials and exact DOF counts are manufacturer-defined; third-party sources list L7 as a 55-DOF bipedal platform and Q5 as earlier-generation 44-DOF design, reflecting differences in joint complexity and articulation. Build focus for L7 appears weighted toward factory/automation robustness and payload handling, whereas Q5's build appears optimized for service durability and modular add-ons.

L7 advertises a higher top speed of 14.4 km/h (4 m/s) and a gait suitable for fast traversal, supporting multi-sensor fusion (3D LiDAR, stereo vision) with SLAM-based navigation for dynamic environments, which supports factory automation and rapid transit between stations. Q5 lists a speed of 1.5 m/s and indoor SLAM/visual SLAM with LiDAR mapping, indicating prioritization of safe, steady movement in populated indoor spaces like retail or elder-care facilities. Both platforms provide autonomous and teleoperation modes, but L7’s higher speed and multi-sensor fusion suggest better performance where rapid, accurate navigation is required, while Q5’s configuration emphasizes controlled navigation in human-populated service contexts.

L7’s sensor suite includes stereo RGB-D cameras, LiDAR, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, and ultrasonic sensors, enabling depth perception, 3D mapping, and force-aware manipulation for sorting and tool handling. Q5 adds temperature sensors to a similar base set (RGB, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors), broadening environmental and human-centric sensing useful for care and hospitality applications. Both use LiDAR and stereo vision for SLAM and perception, but L7’s explicit RGB-D listing and multi-sensor fusion highlight 3D perception for manipulation, while Q5’s additional environmental sensors support interaction and safety in service roles.

L7 ships with custom AI software running on an ERA-42 onboard embodied AI computer and integrates with ROS, providing APIs for control and programming suited to autonomous control and remote teleoperation workflows. Q5’s software stack is described as ROS2 plus a proprietary OS with Python and C++ support and APIs, and advertises learned behaviors and teleoperation options, indicating a software orientation toward service behaviors and developer extensibility. Both platforms support autonomous operation and teleoperation, but L7 emphasizes embodied AI compute for high-speed manipulation and navigation while Q5 emphasizes ROS2-based development and learned behavior modules for interactive tasks.

L7 lists a typical lithium-ion battery lifespan of 3–5 years rather than per-charge runtime, indicating design-level battery longevity considerations for continuous industrial use; the platform targets frequent operation at higher speeds which implies higher instantaneous power draw. Q5 lists battery lifespan of 4 years, consistent with long-term service deployments and modular maintenance cycles, and its lower top speed (1.5 m/s) suggests lower continuous power demand during operation. Neither robot provides explicit per-charge runtime in the provided specs, so direct per-shift endurance comparisons cannot be made from the given data.

L7 is positioned for factory automation, sorting, tool handling, and research labs where speed, payload, and advanced onboard compute are priorities, matching its higher speed, 3D perception emphasis, and ERA-42 integration. Q5 is positioned for elder care, child interaction, retail service, logistics, hospitality, and research labs where safety, interactive sensing, and learned behaviors are important, matching its sensor additions (temperature) and ROS2/proprietary software stack aimed at service applications. Both are used in research labs, but L7 is optimized for industrial throughput while Q5 is optimized for human-facing service scenarios.

Both robots include emergency stop capability, collision detection/obstacle avoidance, and force-limited or torque-limited joints to reduce harm during contact, reflecting collaborative safety design principles. L7 emphasizes torque-limited joints and real-time environmental sensing for obstacle avoidance during higher-speed operations, aligning safety measures with its mobility profile. Q5 highlights force limiting, collision detection, and a collaborative mode appropriate for close human interaction in service settings, and its lower operating speed reduces kinetic risk in populated environments.

L7 integrates custom AI software with an ERA-42 embodied AI computer and likely ROS integration with APIs for programming and control, indicating a focus on onboard AI-driven autonomy and developer access for robotics integration. Q5 explicitly supports ROS2 alongside a proprietary OS and APIs with Python and C++ support, which may ease integration into modern robotics stacks and accommodate learned-behavior frameworks used in service robotics. The difference in ROS vs ROS2 emphasis and the presence of ERA-42 hardware on L7 suggest slightly different development workflows and potential compatibility considerations for integrators.

L7 is listed at a fixed price of $120,000 reflecting a targeted industrial/research price point with specified capabilities for mobility and manipulation. Q5 is estimated between $100,000 and $150,000, indicating variable configurations or optional modules that affect cost and making direct price comparisons dependent on selected payloads, sensors, or software packages. Budget planning should consider that Q5’s variable range may cover service-specific add-ons while L7’s fixed price reflects a defined industrial configuration.