Mirokaï by Enchanted Tools targets service robotics in structured social environments like hospitals and hospitality, emphasizing human-robot interaction through its compact 123 cm height and 29 kg weight. Its ball-bot base enables omnidirectional movement at 3.2 km/h, distinguishing it from wheeled humanoids with specialized hands achieving 97% grasping success for trays and standardized objects. Priced at US $30,000+ with monthly maintenance, it prioritizes reliability in repetitive manipulation and guiding tasks via visual SLAM navigation.
Q5 by Robot Era positions itself for diverse applications including elder care, retail, and logistics, with a taller 165 cm frame and heavier 70 kg build suited for robust interactions. It offers higher speed of 1.5 m/s and a purchase price of $50,000-$75,000, differentiating through comprehensive sensor fusion with LiDAR for indoor mapping. Control includes teleoperation and learned behaviors, supporting use cases from child interaction to research labs.
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
Mirokaï measures 123 cm x 52.5 cm x 50 cm and weighs 29 kg, using a ball-bot base for omnidirectional agility and animation-inspired features like projector face for emotional interaction. Q5 stands at 165 x 50 x 52 cm and 70 kg, providing a more imposing humanoid form factor better suited for physical tasks in care and logistics. Mirokaï's lighter build and 26 degrees of freedom prioritize social engagement, while Q5's structure supports heavier payloads in varied environments.

Mobility & Navigation
Mirokaï achieves 3.2 km/h (0.8-0.9 m/s) via visual SLAM with social awareness for indoor spaces, leveraging its spherical base for swift, agile movement. Q5 reaches 1.5 m/s using indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping, enabling faster traversal in complex indoor settings. Both support autonomous navigation, but Q5's higher speed suits dynamic logistics while Mirokaï emphasizes safe human proximity.

Sensors & Perception
Mirokaï equips 2 RGBD cameras, 2 infrared, 9 time-of-flight, 8 torque sensors, 6 ultrasound, 4 microphones, 3 IMUs, and hand sensors for 360-degree awareness and manipulation. Q5 uses RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force, and temperature sensors for comprehensive environmental perception. Mirokaï's specialized array excels in social and visual tasks, whereas Q5's LiDAR enhances precise mapping.

AI Capabilities
Mirokaï supports autonomous navigation, teleoperation, and learned behaviors via custom Linux OS and ROS2, with real-time speech recognition and multilingual interaction. Q5 offers teleoperation, autonomous control, and learned behaviors through ROS2 and proprietary OS with Python/C++ APIs. Both enable AI-driven adaptability, with Mirokaï focusing on emotional engagement and Q5 on broad application versatility.

Battery & Power Efficiency
Mirokaï provides a 3-5 year battery lifespan, supporting 4-hour operations in practical use for social logistics tasks. Q5 offers a 4-year battery duration, aligning with extended deployments in care and service roles. Both emphasize long-term power for continuous indoor operation without frequent recharges.

Use-Case Suitability
Mirokaï excels in guiding visitors, carrying trays, repetitive manipulation, and social engagement in public spaces like hospitals and hotels. Q5 applies to elder care, child interaction, retail service, research, logistics, and hospitality with higher payload handling. Mirokaï suits HRI-focused environments, while Q5 addresses physically demanding multi-domain needs.

Software Ecosystem
Mirokaï runs custom Linux OS, ROS2 compatible, with Python and C++ APIs for programming autonomous and learned behaviors. Q5 uses ROS2, proprietary OS, and Python/C++ APIs for teleoperation and AI integration. Both platforms facilitate developer access and extensibility in service robotics applications.

Pricing & Value
Mirokaï costs US $30,000+ plus monthly maintenance fees, targeting ongoing service in specialized social settings. Q5 ranges $50,000-$75,000 as a one-time purchase, offering value for diverse logistics and care deployments. Pricing reflects Mirokaï's subscription model versus Q5's upfront investment.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
4
Mirokaï
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
12
Q5
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Mirokaï | Q5 |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying Capacity | 3 kg per arm | 10 |
| Deadlift Capacity | 3 kg maximum | 20 |
| Autonomy Level | Semi-autonomous with teleoperation fallback | Semi-autonomous, teleoperated |
| Price | US $30,000+ monthly maintenance fees | $50,000 - $75,000 |
| Weight | 29 kg | 70 kg |
| Max Speed | 3.2 km/h (0.8-0.9 m/s) | 1.5 m/s |
| Runtime | 4 hours on full charge | >4 hours |
| Battery Pack | 1.5 kWh | 50000mAh |
| Dimensions | 123 cm x 52.5 cm x 50 cm | 165 x 50 x 52 |
| Sensors | 2 RGBD cameras, 2 infrared cameras, 9 time-of-flight cameras, 8 torque sensors, 6 ultrasound sensors, 4 microphones, 3 inertial measurement units (IMUs), Hall effect and contact sensors in hands, Bluetooth receiver | RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, temperature sensors |
Showing 10 of 53 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


RB-Y1 vs Q5
Compare RB-Y1 and Q5. Detailed analysis of sensors, navigation, speed, and battery life.


Hiva Haiwa vs Q5
In-depth comparison of Hiva Haiwa by Haier and Q5 by Robot Era. Analyze sensors, navigation, speed, and software capabilities.


Star1 vs Q5
Head-to-head: Star1 vs Q5. Explore differences in speed, sensors, battery, navigation, and use-case suitability.


Mirokaï vs TIAGo Pro
Mirokaï or TIAGo Pro? Compare specs, navigation, battery, and sensors.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.