Q5 by Robot Era vs AgiBot A2 Ultra by AgiBot

In-depth comparison of Q5 by Robot Era and AgiBot A2 Ultra by AgiBot. Analyze sensors, navigation, battery life, and mobility differences.

Q5
Robot Era

Q5

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$100,000 - $150,000 (Estimated)
vs
AgiBot A2 Ultra
AgiBot

AgiBot A2 Ultra

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$150,000 - $200,000 (Estimated)

The Q5 by Robot Era is a humanoid service robot positioned for indoor applications including elder care, retail service, and hospitality. It features a compact frame measuring 165 x 50 x 52 cm and weighs 70 kg, enabling operation in confined spaces. Key differentiators include a diverse sensor array with RGB cameras, stereo cameras, ultrasonic sensors, and temperature sensors, alongside navigation via Indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping. Control options encompass teleoperation, autonomous modes, and learned behaviors, supported by ROS2 and proprietary software.

The AgiBot A2 Ultra by AgiBot targets customer service, logistics, and manufacturing with an ergonomic design for natural human-robot interaction. Its dimensions are 169 x 75 x 30 cm and it weighs 69 kg, providing a slimmer profile in depth. It stands out with a higher speed of 0.8 m/s and sensors including LiDAR, RGB-D camera, and fisheye camera. Navigation mirrors the Q5 with Indoor SLAM, LiDAR mapping, and visual SLAM, while control includes autonomous, learned behaviors, and teleoperation on a proprietary OS with ROS2 compatibility.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationQ5AgiBot A2 Ultra
Price$100,000 - $150,000 (Estimated)$150,000 - $200,000 (Estimated)
Weight70 kg69 kg
Max Speed1.5 m/s2.88 km/h (0.8 m/s)
Runtime>4 hours2-3 hours
Battery Pack50000mAh14.4 Ah
Dimensions165 x 50 x 52169 x 75 x 30 cm
SensorsRGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, temperature sensorsLiDAR, RGB-D camera, Fisheye Camera, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors
Charging Time4 hours (Estimated)2 hours
Navigation SystemIndoor SLAM, visual SLAM, LiDAR mappingIndoor SLAM, LiDAR mapping, visual SLAM
Control MethodTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviorsAutonomous, learned behaviors, teleoperation

Showing 10 of 50 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot A2 Ultra

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Q5 measures 165 x 50 x 52 cm and weighs 70 kg, offering a taller and narrower profile suited for tight indoor spaces. AgiBot A2 Ultra dimensions are 169 x 75 x 30 cm with 69 kg weight, featuring greater width but significantly reduced depth for ergonomic interaction. Both employ lightweight builds under 70 kg to facilitate mobility in service environments.

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot A2 Ultra

Mobility & Navigation

Trade-off

Q5 achieves 1.5 m/s speed, surpassing AgiBot A2 Ultra's 0.8 m/s, enabling faster task completion in dynamic settings. Both utilize Indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping for obstacle avoidance and route planning. Q5's compact base further supports maneuverability in confined workspaces.

Q5: +2
Q5

Sensors & Perception

Winner 🏆 Q5

Q5 includes RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, and temperature sensors for comprehensive environmental awareness. AgiBot A2 Ultra equips LiDAR, RGB-D camera, fisheye camera, IMU, gyroscope, and force sensors, emphasizing depth perception. Q5 provides additional ultrasonic and stereo capabilities for enhanced precision.

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot A2 Ultra

AI Capabilities

Trade-off

Both robots support autonomous control, learned behaviors, and teleoperation, integrating ROS2, proprietary OS, Python, C++, and APIs. Q5 leverages embodied AI models for motion data collection and adaptive learning in human-like interactions. AgiBot A2 Ultra focuses on ergonomic design for natural collaboration across its use cases.

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot A2 Ultra

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

Q5 battery is rated for 4 years, ensuring reliable long-term operation in continuous service roles. AgiBot A2 Ultra offers 3-5 years, providing comparable endurance with potential usage variability. Both prioritize extended battery life for minimal downtime in deployment.

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot A2 Ultra

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

Q5 targets elder care, child interaction, retail service, research labs, logistics, and hospitality with versatile interaction capabilities. AgiBot A2 Ultra suits customer service, logistics, manufacturing, research, and entertainment via ergonomic human-like engagement. Overlaps exist in logistics and research, while each emphasizes distinct service sectors.

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot A2 Ultra

Software Ecosystem

Trade-off

Q5 runs on ROS2, proprietary OS, with Python, C++, and APIs for integration and development. AgiBot A2 Ultra uses proprietary OS with ROS2 compatibility, Python, C++, and integration APIs. Both enable flexible programming and extensibility for custom applications.

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot A2 Ultra

Safety Features

Trade-off

Q5 incorporates force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative mode for safe human proximity. AgiBot A2 Ultra matches with identical safety measures including force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative mode. These features support shared workspace operations.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

9

Q5

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

7

AgiBot A2 Ultra

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.