T800 by EngineAI vs A2 Ultra by AgiBot: Review

EngineAI T800 or AgiBot A2 Ultra? Compare specs, navigation, battery, and sensors for industrial and service robotics.

T800
EngineAI

T800

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$150,000 - $200,000 (Estimated)
vs
AgiBot A2 Ultra
AgiBot

AgiBot A2 Ultra

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$150,000 - $200,000 (Estimated)

The T800 by EngineAI is positioned as a robust humanoid robot designed for heavy-duty industrial and commercial applications. It stands out with its larger dimensions, heavier weight, and advanced strength capabilities, making it suitable for tasks requiring endurance and physical power. The T800 incorporates a wide range of sensors and advanced navigation systems, alongside a proprietary OS and ROS2 support, reflecting its emphasis on versatility and autonomy.

The A2 Ultra by AgiBot targets customer service, logistics, and research sectors with its lighter frame and ergonomic design. It differentiates itself with AI-powered sensors tailored for human interaction and precision tasks, while maintaining compatibility with ROS2 and offering APIs for integration. The AgiBot A2 Ultra emphasizes indoor mobility and specialized applications, with a battery life range that matches or exceeds comparable robots.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationT800AgiBot A2 Ultra
Price$150,000 - $200,000 (Estimated)$150,000 - $200,000 (Estimated)
Weight85 kg69 kg
Max Speed5 km/h (1.4 m/s)2.88 km/h (0.8 m/s)
Runtime8 hours2-3 hours
Battery Pack5kWh14.4 Ah
Dimensions185 x 60 x 40 cm169 x 75 x 30 cm
SensorsRGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, temperature sensorsLiDAR, RGB-D camera, Fisheye Camera, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors
Charging Time2 hours2 hours
Navigation SystemVisual SLAM, LiDAR mappingIndoor SLAM, LiDAR mapping, visual SLAM
Control MethodAutonomous, learned behaviors, teleoperationAutonomous, learned behaviors, teleoperation

Showing 10 of 55 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot A2 Ultra

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

The T800 measures 185 x 60 x 40 cm and weighs 85 kg, making it larger and heavier than the AgiBot A2 Ultra, which is 169 x 75 x 30 cm and weighs 69 kg. The T800’s build is optimized for heavy-duty and industrial purposes, reflecting its bulkier frame, whereas the AgiBot A2 Ultra features a sleeker and more compact design to support customer interaction and indoor environments.

AgiBot A2 Ultra: +2
AgiBot A2 Ultra

Mobility & Navigation

Winner 🏆 AgiBot A2 Ultra

The T800 achieves a higher top speed of 5 km/h compared to the AgiBot A2 Ultra’s 2.88 km/h, indicating superior mobility for tasks demanding quicker movement. Both robots utilize sophisticated navigation techniques including visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping, but the AgiBot A2 Ultra also incorporates indoor-specific SLAM, enhancing its performance in confined or structured spaces.

T800: +2
T800

Sensors & Perception

Winner 🏆 T800

The T800 is equipped with an extensive sensor suite including RGB and stereo cameras, 360° omnidirectional LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, and temperature sensors. In contrast, the AgiBot A2 Ultra utilizes LiDAR, RGB-D and fisheye cameras, IMU, gyroscope, and force sensors, focusing on AI-powered perception for human interactions and precision tasks, with slightly fewer sensor types overall.

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot A2 Ultra

AI Capabilities

Trade-off

Both robots support autonomous behavior, learned behaviors, and teleoperation control modes, with software ecosystems including proprietary OS, ROS2 compatibility, and programming in Python and C++. The T800 features additional integration of a proprietary end-to-end vision language action model, enhancing its AI perception and decision-making, while the AgiBot A2 Ultra offers APIs for easier integration into diverse applications.

T800: +2
T800

Battery & Power Efficiency

Winner 🏆 T800

The T800 comes with a battery estimated to last about 4 years, designed for continuous heavy-duty use, whereas the AgiBot A2 Ultra offers a wider battery life range of 3 to 5 years, allowing flexibility depending on usage patterns. This difference reflects the T800’s higher power demand due to its heavier build and stronger actuation.

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot A2 Ultra

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

The T800 is suited for heavy industrial tasks, robot boxing, retail assistance, human-robot interaction, and logistics automation, emphasizing strength and endurance in physically demanding roles. The AgiBot A2 Ultra focuses on customer service, logistics, manufacturing, research, and entertainment, prioritizing social interaction capabilities and indoor operational efficiency.

AgiBot A2 Ultra: +2
AgiBot A2 Ultra

Software Ecosystem

Winner 🏆 AgiBot A2 Ultra

EngineAI’s T800 operates on a proprietary OS with ROS2 and supports Python and C++, aimed at high-performance robotics applications with advanced AI models. AgiBot A2 Ultra also uses a proprietary OS with ROS2 compatibility and includes APIs for integration, making it flexible for academic, research, and customized commercial use cases.

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot A2 Ultra

Safety Features

Trade-off

Both robots incorporate safety mechanisms such as force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative mode. These features ensure safe human-robot interaction and minimize risks in shared work environments, suitable for both industrial and customer-facing applications.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

8

T800

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

8

AgiBot A2 Ultra

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.