Next-Gen IRON (XPENG) vs T800 (EngineAI)

Next-Gen IRON or T800? Compare specs, sensors, navigation, speed, and battery life for optimal humanoid performance.

Next‑Gen IRON
XPENG

Next‑Gen IRON

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$150,000 - $250,000 USD (Estimated)
vs
T800
EngineAI

T800

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$150,000 - $200,000 (Estimated)

The Next-Gen IRON by XPENG positions itself as an advanced humanoid robot leveraging automotive AI expertise for versatile applications in customer guidance, sales assistance, industrial inspection, healthcare support, and research. Its market positioning emphasizes bionic design with 178 cm height, 70 kg weight, and unique features like touch sensors embedded in skin and indoor SLAM navigation. Key differentiators include slightly higher max walking speed of 6 km/h and comprehensive sensor suite enabling precise environmental interaction.

The T800 by EngineAI targets robust applications such as heavy-duty industrial tasks, robot boxing, retail assistance, human-robot interaction, and logistics automation, establishing its place in demanding physical environments. With dimensions of 185 x 60 x 40 cm and 85 kg weight, it offers a more substantial build suited for strength-oriented roles. Differentiators encompass its focus on heavy-duty capabilities and comparable control modes including autonomous operation and learned behaviors.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationNext‑Gen IRONT800
Price$150,000 - $250,000 USD (Estimated)$150,000 - $200,000 (Estimated)
Weight70 kg85 kg
Max Speed6 km/h (1.67 m/s) max walking speed5 km/h (1.4 m/s)
Runtime6 hours on full charge (Estimated)8 hours
Battery Pack2.5 kWh solid-state battery5kWh
Dimensions178 x 50 x 40 cm185 x 60 x 40
SensorsRGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, temperature sensors, touch sensors embedded in skinRGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, temperature sensors
Charging Time2 hours2 hours
Navigation SystemVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, indoor SLAMVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping
Control MethodAutonomous, teleoperation, learned behaviorsAutonomous, learned behaviors, teleoperation

Showing 10 of 50 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
T800

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Next-Gen IRON measures 178 x 50 x 40 cm and weighs 70 kg, providing a lighter and slimmer profile compared to T800's 185 x 60 x 40 cm and 85 kg build. Both feature humanoid structures, but Next-Gen IRON includes touch sensors embedded in skin for enhanced tactile feedback. T800's heavier frame aligns with its heavy-duty use cases, while Next-Gen IRON prioritizes agility in varied environments.

T800: +2
T800

Mobility & Navigation

Winner 🏆 T800

Next-Gen IRON achieves a maximum walking speed of 6 km/h (1.67 m/s) using Visual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, and indoor SLAM, slightly outperforming T800's 5 km/h (1.4 m/s) with Visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping. Both support autonomous navigation, but Next-Gen IRON's additional indoor SLAM enhances precision in confined spaces. This enables Next-Gen IRON for customer guidance, while T800 suits logistics automation.

T800: +2
T800

Sensors & Perception

Winner 🏆 T800

Next-Gen IRON equips RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, temperature sensors, and touch sensors embedded in skin. T800 includes RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, and temperature sensors, lacking embedded touch sensors. The extra tactile sensing in Next-Gen IRON supports healthcare and interaction tasks.

Trade-off: +1 each
T800

AI Capabilities

Trade-off

Both robots offer autonomous control, teleoperation, and learned behaviors, with proprietary OS based on ROS2 supporting Python and C++ APIs. Next-Gen IRON's control includes explicit indoor navigation advantages, while T800 emphasizes heavy-duty learned behaviors for industrial tasks. Shared software foundations enable similar AI extensibility.

Trade-off: +1 each
T800

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

Next-Gen IRON and T800 both provide a 4-year battery lifespan, ensuring long-term operational reliability without frequent recharges. This equivalence supports extended deployments in industrial inspection or logistics. Neither specifies runtime per charge, focusing instead on overall endurance.

T800: +2
T800

Use-Case Suitability

Winner 🏆 T800

Next-Gen IRON targets customer guidance, sales assistance, industrial inspection, research, and healthcare support, leveraging its lighter build and tactile sensors. T800 focuses on heavy-duty industrial tasks, robot boxing, retail assistance, human-robot interaction, and logistics automation, benefiting from its robust 85 kg frame. Overlaps exist in retail and interaction, but specialization drives distinct applications.

T800: +2
T800

Pricing & Value

Winner 🏆 T800

Next-Gen IRON pricing ranges from $150,000 to $250,000 USD estimated, slightly higher than T800's $150,000 to $200,000 range. The premium for Next-Gen IRON reflects added sensors and speed, while T800 offers value for heavy-duty needs. Both fall in the high-end humanoid market segment.

Trade-off: +1 each
T800

Safety Features

Trade-off

Both robots include force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative mode for safe human interaction. Shared safety protocols enable co-working in industrial and retail settings. No additional differentiators are specified.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

4

Next‑Gen IRON

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

12

T800

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.