The 3i P10 Ultra positions itself in the mid-range home vacuum cleaner market with a price range of $700-$1100. It features a compact design at 34 cm diameter x 10 cm height and weighs 4.5 kg. Key differentiators include dual 3D structured light sensors alongside LiDAR and AI camera for navigation. Its proprietary firmware supports AI-enhanced cleaning algorithms and SLAM-based 3D mapping.
The Dreame L50 Ultra targets the premium segment within $800-$1000, competing directly with high-spec models. It measures 34.8 x 35.2 x 9.7 cm and weighs 4.44 kg, slightly slimmer in height. Standout features encompass RGB camera, LED path illumination, and AI-enhanced obstacle avoidance via spinning LiDAR. Dreamehome OS integrates these for optimized autonomous cleaning.
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
Both robots have similar dimensions around 35 cm diameter and under 10 cm height, with 3i P10 Ultra at 34 cm x 10 cm and Dreame L50 Ultra at 34.8 x 35.2 x 9.7 cm. Weights are close, 4.5 kg for 3i versus 4.44 kg for Dreame. Dreame operates quieter at 70 dB compared to 3i’s 74 dB, while power consumption differs at 75W for 3i and 38W for Dreame.

Mobility & Navigation
3i P10 Ultra employs spinning LiDAR with SLAM and 3D mapping for precise pathing. Dreame L50 Ultra uses spinning LiDAR enhanced by AI for obstacle avoidance, supported by RGB and 3D structured light. Real-world tests show both handle navigation well, though Dreame demonstrates stronger obstacle avoidance in some evaluations.

Sensors & Perception
3i P10 Ultra includes LiDAR, dual 3D structured light, AI camera, ultrasonic, cliff, and bump sensors. Dreame L50 Ultra features LiDAR, RGB camera, 3D structured light, cliff, bump sensors, plus LED path illumination. These setups enable advanced perception, with Dreame adding visual aids for low-light conditions.

AI Capabilities
Both leverage AI for visual recognition and cleaning algorithms, with 3i using proprietary firmware and Dreame running Dreamehome OS. Navigation benefits from AI-powered obstacle avoidance in both. Dreame’s implementation pairs RGB data for enhanced detection over 3i’s dual structured light approach.

Battery & Power Efficiency
Battery life is rated 2-3 years for both, but runtime differs: 200 min for 3i P10 Ultra versus 220 min for Dreame L50 Ultra on 5200 mAh and 6400 mAh capacities respectively. Charging takes 4 hours each. Dreame shows slight edge in efficiency per tests.

Use-Case Suitability
Designed for home cleaning, both excel in vacuuming and mopping tasks on hard floors and low-pile carpets. 3i P10 Ultra performs strongly in debris pickup, close to top models in tests. Dreame L50 Ultra leads in pet hair and deep cleaning scenarios per evaluations.

Pricing & Value
3i P10 Ultra ranges $700-$1100, often available under $650 in promotions. Dreame L50 Ultra sits at $800-$1000, positioned as top performer in its bracket. Value aligns with specs, Dreame offering higher suction at 19500 Pa versus 18000 Pa.

Safety Features
Both include child lock, cliff detection, and anti-collision sensors. Dreame enhances with AI obstacle avoidance and LED illumination. 3i adds ultrasonic and bump sensors for redundancy in detection.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
6
3i P10 Ultra
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
10
Dreame L50 Ultra
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | 3i P10 Ultra | Dreame L50 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Suction Power | 18,000 Pa | 19,500 Pa |
| Dust Bin Capacity | 400 ml onboard dustbin | 395 ml |
| Water Tank Capacity | 300 ml | 80 ml (robot water tank) |
| Self-Emptying System | Yes, auto-empty dock with 3L dust bag capacity | Yes, with auto-empty dock |
| Cleaning Modes | Auto, spot, edge, scheduled cleaning, no-go zones | Auto, spot, edge, scheduled, pet-finding mode, no-go zones, no-mop zones |
| Cleaning Area | Up to 250 sq m (approx. 2700 sq ft) per charge | Up to 300 m² (approximate typical coverage per charge) |
| Filter Type | HEPA filter, washable | HEPA filter, washable |
| Brush Type | Main brush with anti-tangle bristles and hidden TangleCut blade; side brushes for edges | HyperStream™ Detangling DuoBrush (main brush), extendable side brush with Dual Flex Arm Technology |
| Mopping Capability | Yes, dual spinning mops with automatic extension and retraction, continuous water dampening | Yes, with automated water refill and sensor-based mop lifting for carpets |
| Price | USD 700-1100 Based on the market & region | $800-$1000 |
Showing 10 of 53 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


Eureka J15 Max Ultra vs 3i P10 Ultra
Compare Eureka J15 Max Ultra vs 3i P10 Ultra for cleaning performance, pet hair handling, navigation accuracy, and long-term ownership value.


3i P10 Ultra vs Dreame X50 Ultra
Compare 3i P10 Ultra vs Dreame X50 Ultra for cleaning performance, pet hair handling, navigation accuracy, and long-term maintenance value.


Narwal Flow vs Dreame L50 Ultra
Compare Narwal Flow vs Dreame L50 Ultra for cleaning performance, navigation accuracy, battery runtime, and pet hair handling in real homes.


Qrevo Curv vs Dreame L50 Ultra
Qrevo Curv or Dreame L50 Ultra? Compare cleaning performance, navigation accuracy, battery runtime, and pet hair handling for smarter ownership decisions.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.