Alpha by Clone Robotics vs LUS2 by Lumos Robotics: Review

Head-to-head: Alpha vs LUS2. Explore differences in navigation, battery, sensors, speed, and software.

Alpha by Clone Robotics is positioned in the market for versatile humanoid applications including industrial automation, home assistance, and research prototyping. Its taller dimensions of 170 x 45 x 30 cm and 60 kg weight provide balanced agility and stability for human-robot collaboration. Key differentiators include a 4.5-year battery life, extensive sensors such as 4 depth cameras and 320 pressure sensors, and Linux-based software with ROS compatibility.

LUS2 by Lumos Robotics targets industrial automation, healthcare assistance, search-and-rescue, and dynamic environments. Measuring 160 x 50 x 30 cm and weighing 57 kg, it emphasizes agility in confined spaces. Standout features encompass Intel RealSense D435i sensors, 360° LiDAR, 3-year battery duration, and ROS2-compatible proprietary OS with LLM integration APIs.

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
LUS2

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Alpha measures 170 x 45 x 30 cm and weighs 60 kg, offering greater height for reach in industrial tasks. LUS2 is slightly shorter at 160 x 50 x 30 cm and lighter at 57 kg, potentially aiding maneuverability in tight spaces. Both maintain humanoid proportions suitable for human-like interaction and collaboration.

LUS2: +2
LUS2

Mobility & Navigation

Winner 🏆 LUS2

Alpha achieves 5 km/h speed with LiDAR, SLAM, and visual odometry for navigation. LUS2 reaches 4 km/h using indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping, optimized for dynamic environments. Alpha's higher speed supports faster traversal in open industrial areas, while LUS2 focuses on precision in varied terrains.

Alpha: +2
Alpha

Sensors & Perception

Winner 🏆 Alpha

Alpha incorporates 4 depth cameras, 70 inertial sensors, 320 pressure sensors, IMU, gyroscope, and force sensors. LUS2 features Intel RealSense D435i, finger/palm tactile sensors, IMU, ultrasonic sensors, 360° LiDAR, gyroscope, force sensors, and temperature sensors. Alpha emphasizes pressure and inertial density, whereas LUS2 adds comprehensive LiDAR and tactile coverage.

LUS2: +2
LUS2

AI Capabilities

Winner 🏆 LUS2

Alpha employs AI automation with manual override on a custom AI platform. LUS2 utilizes autonomous control, learned behaviors, and teleoperation. Both support advanced decision-making, with LUS2 offering explicit LLM integration potential via APIs.

Trade-off: +1 each
LUS2

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

Alpha provides a 4.5-year battery life, exceeding LUS2's 3 years. Alpha's design leverages efficient power systems for extended operation in research and home settings. LUS2's duration suits shorter-cycle tasks in healthcare and rescue scenarios.

Trade-off: +1 each
LUS2

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

Alpha suits industrial automation, home assistance, research prototyping, and human-robot collaboration. LUS2 targets industrial automation, healthcare assistance, search-and-rescue, dynamic environments, and R&D. Overlaps exist in industrial and research applications, with LUS2 extending to emergency response.

LUS2: +2
LUS2

Software Ecosystem

Winner 🏆 LUS2

Alpha runs Linux-based software that is ROS-compatible with a custom AI platform. LUS2 uses a proprietary OS, ROS2 compatibility, Python, C++, and APIs for LLM integration. LUS2 provides broader programming flexibility for custom developments.

LUS2: +2
LUS2

Safety Features

Winner 🏆 LUS2

Alpha includes emergency stop, obstacle detection, and collision avoidance. LUS2 offers force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative mode. Both prioritize human-safe operations in shared spaces.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

5

Alpha

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

11

LUS2

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationAlphaLUS2
Carrying Capacity10 kg per arm 10 kg per arm
Deadlift Capacity20 kg50 kg
Degrees of Freedom164+ (upper body 164, full estimated 250+)38
Autonomy LevelSemi-autonomousAutonomous navigation and task execution with integrated perception and motion control
Price$100,000USD 99,000
Weight60 kg57 kg
Max Speed5 km/h (1.39 m/s)4 km/h (1.12 m/s)
Runtime1.5 hours3 hours on full charge
Battery Pack2.8 kWh10000mAh
Dimensions170 x 45 x 30 (cm)160 x 50 x 30 (cm)

Showing 10 of 54 specifications

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.