Figure 03 by Figure AI is positioned as a general-purpose humanoid robot optimized for home environments, enabling tasks like laundry, cleaning, and dishwashing. It differentiates through its vision-language-action AI via the Helix system, advanced cameras including palm-mounted ones, and tactile fingertip sensors for delicate object manipulation. With dimensions of 167 cm x 60 cm x 50 cm and a weight of 45 kg, it prioritizes safety features like multi-density foam and soft textiles for household deployment.
AgiBot X2-N by AgiBot targets industrial and dynamic applications such as logistics, search-and-rescue, and automation, with a height of 175 cm and weight of 55 kg. It stands out with higher speed of 7 km/h and reliance on proprioceptive sensors for navigation without cameras or external aids. This design supports real-time gait adjustment in varied environments, contrasting home-focused robots.
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
Figure 03 measures 167 cm x 60 cm x 50 cm and weighs 45 kg, featuring multi-density foam padding and soft textile covering for safe home interaction. AgiBot X2-N stands at 175 cm tall, approximately 50 cm wide and 80 cm long, with 55 kg weight suited for industrial durability. Both share similar lightweight humanoid forms but Figure 03 emphasizes compact, home-safe materials while AgiBot prioritizes proportions for dynamic tasks.

Mobility & Navigation
Figure 03 achieves 4.2 km/h speed using vision-language-action AI, SLAM, and mmWave data offload for adapting to changing home layouts. AgiBot X2-N reaches 7 km/h via proprioceptive feedback and real-time gait adjustment, lacking GPS or LiDAR for self-reliant movement in dynamic settings. AgiBot offers superior speed, while Figure 03 excels in vision-based navigation for cluttered spaces.

Sensors & Perception
Figure 03 integrates cameras including palm-mounted ones, tactile fingertip sensors detecting forces as low as three grams, and mmWave for fleet learning. AgiBot X2-N employs only proprioceptive sensors like joint torque, pressure, and gyros, with no cameras or external sensors. This results in Figure 03 having richer external perception versus AgiBot's internal feedback focus.

AI Capabilities
Figure 03 uses Helix AI system based on ROS and Linux for pixel-to-action learning, supporting voice commands, remote monitoring, and app integration. AgiBot X2-N features AI autonomous control with real-time systems on Linux/ROS, emphasizing proprioceptive-driven decisions. Both leverage ROS ecosystems, but Figure 03 incorporates vision-language models for versatile home autonomy.

Battery & Power Efficiency
Both robots specify a 3-5 year battery lifespan, aligning on long-term power design. Figure 03 includes 2 kWh capacity with 5-hour runtime and 2-hour charging, plus wireless options. AgiBot X2-N matches the lifespan without detailed runtime specs, suggesting comparable endurance for extended operations.

Use-Case Suitability
Figure 03 targets home assistance, chores, elderly care, and light manipulation like cleaning tasks in unpredictable layouts. AgiBot X2-N suits logistics, search-and-rescue, industrial automation, and dynamic navigation without visual reliance. Figure 03 fits domestic settings, while AgiBot excels in rugged, high-mobility industrial scenarios.

Safety Features
Figure 03 incorporates multi-density foam, soft textiles, emergency stop, obstacle avoidance, and pinch protection for home safety. AgiBot X2-N provides emergency stop, proprioception-based obstacle avoidance, and real-time gait adjustments. Both address core safety, with Figure 03 adding contact-soft materials.

Software Ecosystem
Figure 03 runs Helix on ROS and Linux with Python/C++ APIs, voice/app control, and mmWave fleet learning. AgiBot X2-N uses Linux/ROS-based software for real-time AI control. Shared ROS foundation enables similar development, enhanced by Figure 03's vision integration.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
9
Figure 03
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
7
AgiBot X2-N
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Figure 03 | AgiBot X2-N |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying Capacity | 5 kg (11 lbs) | 5.4 kg (single arm) |
| Deadlift Capacity | 10 kg (22 lbs) | 15 kg (based on 120N.m peak joint torque) |
| Degrees of Freedom | - | 28 – 31 DOF (Depends on configuration) |
| Autonomy Level | Fully autonomous with human oversight option | Full social and navigational autonomy |
| Price | $50,000 - $70,000 | USD 34,000 – 45,000 (based on base X2 and X2 Ultra configurations) |
| Weight | 45 kg (99 lbs) | 55 kg |
| Max Speed | 4.2 km/h (2.6 mph) | 1.5 m/s (Bipedal walking); up to 3.0 m/s in Wheeled Mode |
| Runtime | 5 hours | 2–4 hours |
| Battery Pack | 2 kWh | 500Wh Smart Lithium Battery (54.6V) |
| Dimensions | 167 cm x 60 cm x 50 cm (65.7 in x 23.6 in x 19.7 in) | 131 (H) × 46 (W) × 21 cm (L) |
Showing 10 of 54 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


AgiBot X2-N vs Zerith Z1
Which robot wins? AgiBot X2-N vs Zerith Z1 compared across navigation, sensors, and battery.


AgiBot G2 vs AgiBot X2-N
AgiBot G2 or AgiBot X2-N? Compare specs, navigation, battery, and sensors.


Figure 03 vs K2 Bumblebee
Compare Figure 03 and K2 Bumblebee. Detailed analysis of navigation, battery, and sensors.


Figure 03 vs Green
Compare Figure 03 and Green. Detailed analysis of sensors, navigation, and AI capabilities.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.