Figure 03 (Figure AI) vs AgiBot X2-N (AgiBot)

Compare Figure 03 and AgiBot X2-N. Detailed analysis of sensors, navigation, speed, and AI capabilities.

Figure 03
Figure AI

Figure 03

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$50,000 - $70,000
vs
AgiBot X2-N
AgiBot

AgiBot X2-N

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$USD $50,000–$150,000 (Estimated)

Figure 03 by Figure AI is positioned as a general-purpose humanoid robot optimized for home environments, enabling tasks like laundry, cleaning, and dishwashing. It differentiates through its vision-language-action AI via the Helix system, advanced cameras including palm-mounted ones, and tactile fingertip sensors for delicate object manipulation. With dimensions of 167 cm x 60 cm x 50 cm and a weight of 45 kg, it prioritizes safety features like multi-density foam and soft textiles for household deployment.

AgiBot X2-N by AgiBot targets industrial and dynamic applications such as logistics, search-and-rescue, and automation, with a height of 175 cm and weight of 55 kg. It stands out with higher speed of 7 km/h and reliance on proprioceptive sensors for navigation without cameras or external aids. This design supports real-time gait adjustment in varied environments, contrasting home-focused robots.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationFigure 03AgiBot X2-N
Price$50,000 - $70,000USD $50,000–$150,000 (Estimated)
Weight45 kg (99 lbs)55 kg
Max Speed4.2 km/h (2.6 mph)7 km/h
Runtime5 hours2–4
Battery Pack2 kWh2–3 kWh
Dimensions167 cm x 60 cm x 50 cm (65.7 in x 23.6 in x 19.7 in)175 cm (height); width and length not specified (typical humanoid proportions suggest ~50 cm width, ~80 cm length)
SensorsCameras (including palm camera), tactile fingertip sensors, mmWave data offload, multi-density foam for safety, audio systemProprioceptive sensors (joint torque, pressure, internal gyros), no cameras or external sensors[1][4]
Charging Time2 hours2–4 hours
Navigation SystemVision-language-action AI with Helix system, SLAM, mmWave data offload for fleet learningProprioceptive feedback, no GPS or LiDAR
Control MethodAI autonomous control with voice command, remote monitoring, app integrationAI autonomous, real-time control systems

Showing 10 of 50 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot X2-N

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Figure 03 measures 167 cm x 60 cm x 50 cm and weighs 45 kg, featuring multi-density foam padding and soft textile covering for safe home interaction. AgiBot X2-N stands at 175 cm tall, approximately 50 cm wide and 80 cm long, with 55 kg weight suited for industrial durability. Both share similar lightweight humanoid forms but Figure 03 emphasizes compact, home-safe materials while AgiBot prioritizes proportions for dynamic tasks.

AgiBot X2-N: +2
AgiBot X2-N

Mobility & Navigation

Winner 🏆 AgiBot X2-N

Figure 03 achieves 4.2 km/h speed using vision-language-action AI, SLAM, and mmWave data offload for adapting to changing home layouts. AgiBot X2-N reaches 7 km/h via proprioceptive feedback and real-time gait adjustment, lacking GPS or LiDAR for self-reliant movement in dynamic settings. AgiBot offers superior speed, while Figure 03 excels in vision-based navigation for cluttered spaces.

AgiBot X2-N: +2
AgiBot X2-N

Sensors & Perception

Winner 🏆 AgiBot X2-N

Figure 03 integrates cameras including palm-mounted ones, tactile fingertip sensors detecting forces as low as three grams, and mmWave for fleet learning. AgiBot X2-N employs only proprioceptive sensors like joint torque, pressure, and gyros, with no cameras or external sensors. This results in Figure 03 having richer external perception versus AgiBot's internal feedback focus.

Figure 03: +2
Figure 03

AI Capabilities

Winner 🏆 Figure 03

Figure 03 uses Helix AI system based on ROS and Linux for pixel-to-action learning, supporting voice commands, remote monitoring, and app integration. AgiBot X2-N features AI autonomous control with real-time systems on Linux/ROS, emphasizing proprioceptive-driven decisions. Both leverage ROS ecosystems, but Figure 03 incorporates vision-language models for versatile home autonomy.

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot X2-N

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

Both robots specify a 3-5 year battery lifespan, aligning on long-term power design. Figure 03 includes 2 kWh capacity with 5-hour runtime and 2-hour charging, plus wireless options. AgiBot X2-N matches the lifespan without detailed runtime specs, suggesting comparable endurance for extended operations.

Trade-off: +1 each
AgiBot X2-N

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

Figure 03 targets home assistance, chores, elderly care, and light manipulation like cleaning tasks in unpredictable layouts. AgiBot X2-N suits logistics, search-and-rescue, industrial automation, and dynamic navigation without visual reliance. Figure 03 fits domestic settings, while AgiBot excels in rugged, high-mobility industrial scenarios.

Figure 03: +2
Figure 03

Safety Features

Winner 🏆 Figure 03

Figure 03 incorporates multi-density foam, soft textiles, emergency stop, obstacle avoidance, and pinch protection for home safety. AgiBot X2-N provides emergency stop, proprioception-based obstacle avoidance, and real-time gait adjustments. Both address core safety, with Figure 03 adding contact-soft materials.

Figure 03: +2
Figure 03

Software Ecosystem

Winner 🏆 Figure 03

Figure 03 runs Helix on ROS and Linux with Python/C++ APIs, voice/app control, and mmWave fleet learning. AgiBot X2-N uses Linux/ROS-based software for real-time AI control. Shared ROS foundation enables similar development, enhanced by Figure 03's vision integration.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

9

Figure 03

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

7

AgiBot X2-N

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.