Hiva Haiwa by Haier targets household automation with a focus on domestic tasks like cleaning, laundry folding, cooking assistance, and appliance management in smart homes. Positioned in the mid-range price segment of $50,000-$70,000, it offers a 165 x 50 x 40 cm frame weighing 70 kg, supporting remote teleoperation, AI-assisted autonomy, and app control. Key differentiators include its Linux-based OS with ROS integration and specialized navigation via SLAM and visual odometry, making it suitable for structured home environments.
Q5 by Robot Era serves broader applications including elder care, child interaction, retail service, research labs, logistics, and hospitality, priced at $50,000-$75,000. It matches Hiva Haiwa's 165 x 50 x 52 cm dimensions and 70 kg weight but provides higher speed of 1.5 m/s. Distinct features encompass advanced sensors with LiDAR, ROS2 and proprietary OS support, and navigation through indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping for versatile deployment.
Detailed Analysis
Design & Build Quality
Both robots share identical height of 165 cm and weight of 70 kg, with Hiva Haiwa at 40 cm depth and Q5 at 52 cm. Hiva Haiwa emphasizes dexterous hands for household tasks like floor washing and ironing, supported by 44 degrees of freedom reaching up to 2 meters. Q5 maintains similar build for multi-domain use, though specific degrees of freedom are not detailed, enabling applications from elder care to logistics.
Mobility & Navigation
Hiva Haiwa achieves 2 km/h (0.56 m/s) speed using SLAM, visual odometry, and IMU for home navigation. Q5 offers superior 1.5 m/s speed with indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping, enhancing performance in varied settings like retail and hospitality. Both integrate IMU and gyroscope, but Q5's LiDAR provides denser mapping for complex environments.
Sensors & Perception
Hiva Haiwa includes RGB cameras, stereo cameras, ultrasonic, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, and temperature sensors. Q5 adds LiDAR to this array, plus ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force, and temperature sensors for comprehensive perception. The extra LiDAR on Q5 supports precise 3D mapping, while both share core visual and inertial sensing.
AI Capabilities
Hiva Haiwa employs AI-assisted autonomous control alongside remote teleoperation and app control for task execution. Q5 features autonomous operation with learned behaviors and teleoperation, indicating model-based learning for adaptive interactions. Both leverage AI for independence, but Q5's learned behaviors suit dynamic scenarios like child interaction.
Battery & Power Efficiency
Both robots provide a 4-year battery life, indicating comparable power systems for extended operation. No differences in capacity or recharge methods are specified, suggesting equivalent efficiency for continuous household or service tasks. This longevity supports long-term deployments without frequent maintenance.
Use-Case Suitability
Hiva Haiwa specializes in household cleaning, laundry folding, cooking assistance, and smart home appliance management. Q5 covers elder care, child interaction, retail service, research labs, logistics, and hospitality. Hiva Haiwa fits dedicated home automation, while Q5 offers flexibility across service and research domains.
Software Ecosystem
Hiva Haiwa runs Linux-based OS with ROS integration and Python/C++ APIs for development. Q5 uses ROS2, proprietary OS, and Python/C++ APIs, providing updated ROS framework. Both enable extensible programming, with Q5's ROS2 offering improved real-time performance.
Safety Features
Hiva Haiwa includes emergency stop, obstacle avoidance, and collision detection. Q5 adds force limiting and collaborative mode to emergency stop and collision detection. Q5's force limiting enhances human-robot interaction safety in care and hospitality uses.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
5
Hiva Haiwa
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
11
Q5
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Hiva Haiwa | Q5 |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying Capacity | 5 kg per arm | 10 |
| Deadlift Capacity | 10 kg maximum | 20 |
| Degrees of Freedom | 44 | - |
| Autonomy Level | Semi-autonomous (Active data-gathering phase via teleoperation) | Semi-autonomous, teleoperated |
| Price | USD 50,000 - 70,000- Based on the pricing of similar models | $50,000 - $75,000 |
| Weight | 70 kg | 70 kg |
| Max Speed | 2 km/h, 0.56 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Runtime | 4 hours on full charge | >4 hours |
| Battery Pack | 2.5 kWh(High-density power core) | 50000mAh |
| Dimensions | 165 x 50 x 40 (cm) | 165 x 50 x 52 |
Showing 10 of 54 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution
Mirokaï vs Q5
Which robot wins? Mirokaï vs Q5 compared across sensors, navigation, speed, battery, and price for service robotics applications.
RB-Y1 vs Q5
Compare RB-Y1 and Q5. Detailed analysis of sensors, navigation, speed, and battery life.
Star1 vs Q5
Head-to-head: Star1 vs Q5. Explore differences in speed, sensors, battery, navigation, and use-case suitability.
L7 vs Q5
L7 or Q5? Compare specs, navigation, battery, and sensors.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.