AlphaBot 2 by AI² Robotics is a versatile humanoid robot designed for industrial and research applications, emphasizing advanced embodied AI and multi-modal perception. It stands out for its integration of a comprehensive sensor suite and a Linux-based ROS 2 software platform, enabling complex autonomous behaviors and teleoperation. Its design supports a balance between mobility and manipulation for tasks ranging from manufacturing to remote infrastructure inspection.
Green by Sberbank is a humanoid robot positioned similarly in the market, targeting manufacturing, research, logistics, and inspection tasks. It matches AlphaBot 2 closely in physical dimensions, sensor configuration, navigation, and control capabilities. Green’s software and safety features align with industry standards, offering a robust platform for teleoperated and autonomous operations in diverse environments.
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
Both AlphaBot 2 and Green share identical physical dimensions of 170cm height and 55cm by 38cm footprint, with weight ranging from 50 to 80 kg. Their build accommodates humanoid form factors optimized for industrial and research environments, focusing on balance-assisted walking and payload versatility. Material quality and structural design are implied to be comparable, supporting robust operational stability.

Mobility & Navigation
Each robot offers walking speeds between 1.5 and 3 m/s with advanced navigation systems combining Visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping. Balance-assisted walking enhances stability over uneven terrain. Both support autonomous navigation and teleoperation, enabling flexible deployment in dynamic and structured settings such as logistics centers or inspection sites.

Sensors & Perception
AlphaBot 2 and Green utilize an identical set of sensors including RGB and depth cameras, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscopes, accelerometers, and joint encoders. This sensor suite provides comprehensive environmental awareness and proprioception, supporting 360-degree perception and compliant manipulation. Sensor redundancy enhances reliability and safety.

AI Capabilities
Both robots support autonomous and learned behaviors alongside teleoperation. AlphaBot 2 is known to integrate the AI2R Brain platform enabling embodied intelligence with advanced spatial reasoning and task learning. Green’s AI capabilities are similar, supporting multi-modal control and learned behavior execution, although specific AI platform details are less disclosed.

Battery & Power Efficiency
The battery life for both robots spans 3 to 5 years under typical usage conditions, reflecting advanced energy management and longevity. This supports extended deployment cycles with minimal downtime for recharging or battery replacement, essential for continuous industrial or logistical operations.

Use-Case Suitability
Both AlphaBot 2 and Green are tailored for manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations. Their comparable specifications make them suitable for similar task profiles requiring humanoid form factor, mobility, and multi-sensor perception, with software support for diverse autonomous and teleoperated workflows.

Software Ecosystem
Each robot operates on a Linux-based OS and supports ROS 2, providing access to a rich ecosystem of robotics middleware and development tools. Both offer Python SDKs to facilitate customization and integration, enabling developers to extend functionality and tailor robot behavior to specific applications.

Safety Features
AlphaBot 2 and Green implement comprehensive safety measures including force limiting, collision detection, emergency stops, and redundant sensors. These features ensure safe human-robot interaction and operational reliability in complex environments, adhering to industrial safety standards.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
9
AlphaBot 2
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
7
Green
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | AlphaBot 2 | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying Capacity | 15-25 kg per arm | 15-25 kg per arm |
| Deadlift Capacity | 30 kg | 50-100 kg |
| Autonomy Level | Semi-autonomous to fully autonomous | Semi-autonomous to fully autonomous |
| Price | $50,000 - $150,000 | $50,000 - $150,000 |
| Weight | 50-80 kg | 50-80 kg |
| Max Speed | 1.5-3 m/s (walking) | 1.5-3 m/s (walking) |
| Runtime | 3-5 hours | 3-5 hours |
| Battery Pack | 3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo | 3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo |
| Dimensions | 170cm x 55cm x 38cm | 170cm x 55cm x 38cm |
| Sensors | RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders | RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders |
Showing 10 of 52 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


Optimus vs Green
Optimus or Green? Compare specs, navigation, battery, sensors, and speed performance.


AgiBot G2 vs Green
Head-to-head: AgiBot G2 vs Green. Explore differences in navigation, sensors, and battery.


AlphaBot 2 vs Walker Tienkung
Compare AlphaBot 2 and Walker Tienkung. Detailed analysis of navigation, battery, and sensors.


Figure 03 vs Green
Compare Figure 03 and Green. Detailed analysis of sensors, navigation, and AI capabilities.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.