AlphaBot by AI² Robotics vs Green by Sberbank

Head-to-head: AlphaBot vs Green. Explore differences in AI capabilities, sensor suites, and battery longevity.

AlphaBot 2
AI² Robotics

AlphaBot 2

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$50,000 - $150,000
vs
Green
Sberbank

Green

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$50,000 - $150,000

AlphaBot 2 by AI² Robotics is a versatile humanoid robot designed for industrial and research applications, emphasizing advanced embodied AI and multi-modal perception. It stands out for its integration of a comprehensive sensor suite and a Linux-based ROS 2 software platform, enabling complex autonomous behaviors and teleoperation. Its design supports a balance between mobility and manipulation for tasks ranging from manufacturing to remote infrastructure inspection.

Green by Sberbank is a humanoid robot positioned similarly in the market, targeting manufacturing, research, logistics, and inspection tasks. It matches AlphaBot 2 closely in physical dimensions, sensor configuration, navigation, and control capabilities. Green’s software and safety features align with industry standards, offering a robust platform for teleoperated and autonomous operations in diverse environments.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationAlphaBot 2Green
Price$50,000 - $150,000$50,000 - $150,000
Weight50-80 kg50-80 kg
Max Speed1.5-3 m/s (walking)1.5-3 m/s (walking)
Runtime3-5 hours3-5 hours
Battery Pack3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo
Dimensions170cm x 55cm x 38cm170cm x 55cm x 38cm
SensorsRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encodersRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders
Charging Time2-4 hours2-4 hours
Navigation SystemVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walkingVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walking
Control MethodTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviorsTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviors

Showing 10 of 49 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Both AlphaBot 2 and Green share identical physical dimensions of 170cm height and 55cm by 38cm footprint, with weight ranging from 50 to 80 kg. Their build accommodates humanoid form factors optimized for industrial and research environments, focusing on balance-assisted walking and payload versatility. Material quality and structural design are implied to be comparable, supporting robust operational stability.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Mobility & Navigation

Trade-off

Each robot offers walking speeds between 1.5 and 3 m/s with advanced navigation systems combining Visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping. Balance-assisted walking enhances stability over uneven terrain. Both support autonomous navigation and teleoperation, enabling flexible deployment in dynamic and structured settings such as logistics centers or inspection sites.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Sensors & Perception

Trade-off

AlphaBot 2 and Green utilize an identical set of sensors including RGB and depth cameras, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscopes, accelerometers, and joint encoders. This sensor suite provides comprehensive environmental awareness and proprioception, supporting 360-degree perception and compliant manipulation. Sensor redundancy enhances reliability and safety.

AlphaBot 2: +2
AlphaBot 2

AI Capabilities

Winner 🏆 AlphaBot 2

Both robots support autonomous and learned behaviors alongside teleoperation. AlphaBot 2 is known to integrate the AI2R Brain platform enabling embodied intelligence with advanced spatial reasoning and task learning. Green’s AI capabilities are similar, supporting multi-modal control and learned behavior execution, although specific AI platform details are less disclosed.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

The battery life for both robots spans 3 to 5 years under typical usage conditions, reflecting advanced energy management and longevity. This supports extended deployment cycles with minimal downtime for recharging or battery replacement, essential for continuous industrial or logistical operations.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

Both AlphaBot 2 and Green are tailored for manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations. Their comparable specifications make them suitable for similar task profiles requiring humanoid form factor, mobility, and multi-sensor perception, with software support for diverse autonomous and teleoperated workflows.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Software Ecosystem

Trade-off

Each robot operates on a Linux-based OS and supports ROS 2, providing access to a rich ecosystem of robotics middleware and development tools. Both offer Python SDKs to facilitate customization and integration, enabling developers to extend functionality and tailor robot behavior to specific applications.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Safety Features

Trade-off

AlphaBot 2 and Green implement comprehensive safety measures including force limiting, collision detection, emergency stops, and redundant sensors. These features ensure safe human-robot interaction and operational reliability in complex environments, adhering to industrial safety standards.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

9

AlphaBot 2

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

7

Green

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.