Optimus by Tesla vs Green by Sberbank 2025

Optimus or Green? Compare specs, navigation, battery, sensors, and speed performance.

Tesla's Optimus is positioned as a mass-producible humanoid robot for manufacturing and logistics, leveraging Tesla's Full Self-Driving AI for autonomous operation. Its key differentiators include a fixed weight of 57 kg, max speed of 8 km/h, and approximately 8 hours of battery life per charge. The robot uses a custom Tesla OS with vision-based navigation via RGB cameras, depth cameras, and LiDAR.

Sberbank's Green humanoid targets similar industrial applications like research and infrastructure inspection, with a price range of $50,000-$150,000 reflecting its variable configuration options. It stands out with a weight range of 50-80 kg, walking speed of 1.5-3 m/s, and a battery rated for 3-5 years of service life. Navigation relies on visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping, supported by a Linux-based OS with ROS 2.

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Optimus measures 173cm x 55cm x 38cm and weighs 57 kg, designed to mimic human proportions for versatile movement. Green has nearly identical dimensions at 170cm x 55cm x 38cm but a broader weight range of 50-80 kg, allowing adaptability to different payloads. Both employ compliant actuators, though Optimus emphasizes lightweight construction at a fixed 57 kg.

Optimus: +2
Optimus

Mobility & Navigation

Winner 🏆 Optimus

Optimus achieves a max speed of 8 km/h using Tesla FSD-based vision with stereo cameras and internal proprioception for autonomous navigation. Green offers walking speeds of 1.5-3 m/s (5.4-10.8 km/h) via visual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, and balance-assisted walking. Both support complex environments, but Green's teleoperation option provides flexibility beyond full autonomy.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Sensors & Perception

Trade-off

Both robots share identical sensor suites: RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, and joint encoders. Optimus integrates these with FSD vision for real-time perception, while Green uses them for SLAM and collision detection. Redundant sensors on Green enhance reliability in dynamic settings.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

AI Capabilities

Trade-off

Optimus employs fully autonomous control via Tesla's custom AI and FSD integration, enabling learned behaviors from neural networks. Green supports teleoperation, autonomous modes, and learned behaviors on a Linux-based OS with ROS 2 and Python SDK. Optimus prioritizes end-to-end vision-based decision-making, contrasting Green's modular software stack.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

Optimus provides approximately 8 hours of operational use per charge, suited for daily shifts in manufacturing. Green's battery is specified for 3-5 years of service life, likely indicating longevity rather than continuous runtime. This difference highlights Optimus's focus on per-charge endurance versus Green's emphasis on long-term durability.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

Both robots target manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations. Optimus's full autonomy and FSD integration suit unsupervised industrial tasks, while Green's teleoperation and variable weight support collaborative or payload-heavy logistics. Shared use cases reflect overlapping market positioning in humanoid automation.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Software Ecosystem

Trade-off

Optimus runs on Tesla's custom OS tightly integrated with FSD AI for seamless updates and neural network processing. Green utilizes a Linux-based OS with ROS 2 support and Python SDK, enabling broader developer integration and custom behaviors. These ecosystems cater to proprietary versus open-source preferences in deployment.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Pricing & Value

Trade-off

Optimus is priced at $20,000-$50,000, offering lower entry cost for high-volume potential. Green ranges from $50,000-$150,000, aligning with its configurable weight and extended battery life. Price differences may reflect Optimus's economies of scale versus Green's specialized components.

Green: +2
Green

Safety Features

Winner 🏆 Green

Optimus includes emergency stop, obstacle detection, and compliant actuators for human-safe operation. Green features force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and redundant sensors. Both prioritize industrial safety, with Green's redundancies adding layers for variable environments.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

9

Optimus

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

9

Green

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationOptimusGreen
Carrying Capacity20 kg15-25 kg per arm
Deadlift Capacity68 kg (150 lbs)50-100 kg
Degrees of Freedom40+ DOF (full-body dexterity including hands)-
Autonomy LevelSemi-autonomous to fully autonomousSemi-autonomous to fully autonomous
Price$20,000 - $50,000$50,000 - $150,000
Weight57 kg (125 lbs)50-80 kg
Max SpeedMax Speed 8 km/h (5 mph)1.5-3 m/s (walking)
Runtime3-5 hours3-5 hours
Battery PackCustom high-capacity lithium-ion battery3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo
Dimensions173cm x 55cm x 38cm170cm x 55cm x 38cm

Showing 10 of 53 specifications

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.