The K2 Bumblebee by Kepler Robotics is an industrial humanoid robot designed for warehouse automation, assembly lines, and hazardous operations. It stands at 175 cm tall and weighs 75 kg, featuring a hybrid actuation system with planetary roller screw actuators for straight-knee walking and up to 30 kg dual-arm payload. Priced between $34,000 and $40,000, it differentiates through in-house hardware development, over 80 sensors including tactile points per finger, and up to 8 hours of operation per charge. Its Kepler OS supports ROS compatibility and AI autonomy for structured environments.
The Green by Sberbank targets manufacturing, logistics, and infrastructure inspection with a price range of $50,000 to $150,000. Measuring 170 cm x 55 cm x 38 cm and weighing 50-80 kg, it offers walking speeds up to 3 m/s. Key differentiators include visual SLAM navigation, ROS 2 support, and a 3-5 year battery lifespan. It emphasizes teleoperation alongside autonomous modes and redundant sensors for remote operations.
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
K2 Bumblebee features a 175 cm x 60 cm x 50 cm frame weighing 75 kg with 52 degrees of freedom and hybrid serial-parallel actuators using planetary roller screws for straight-knee gait and 81.3% energy efficiency. Green has a slightly smaller 170 cm x 55 cm x 38 cm build at 50-80 kg, supporting balance-assisted walking but without specified degrees of freedom. K2 emphasizes in-house hardware for supply chain resilience, while Green focuses on modular components for varied weights.

Mobility & Navigation
K2 Bumblebee achieves 3 km/h walking speed with LiDAR, SLAM, GPS, and disturbance-resistant gait for autonomous navigation in warehouses. Green reaches 1.5-3 m/s via visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping with balance-assisted walking. K2 prioritizes structured industrial mobility, whereas Green supports higher potential speeds for logistics and inspection.

Sensors & Perception
K2 Bumblebee includes 3D cameras, fisheye vision, up to 25 tactile sensors per finger, six-axis force-torque wrist sensors, IMUs, pressure, torque, and ultrasonic sensors, totaling over 80. Green equips RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, and joint encoders. K2 offers finer tactile feedback for manipulation, while Green provides comprehensive perception for teleoperation.

AI Capabilities
K2 Bumblebee supports AI autonomous control, natural language processing, app control, and VLA+ models for semantic tasks like sorting and assembly. Green enables autonomous modes with learned behaviors and teleoperation. Both integrate Linux-based systems, but K2 adds Kepler OS with voice and motion APIs.

Battery & Power Efficiency
K2 Bumblebee operates up to 8 hours per charge with a 2.33 kWh battery, listed as 4 years in query specs, using efficient hybrid actuators. Green provides 3-5 years battery life without specified runtime per charge. K2 focuses on per-charge endurance for industrial shifts.

Use-Case Suitability
K2 Bumblebee suits warehouse automation, assembly assistance, hazardous operations, guided tours, and research. Green applies to manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations. K2 targets structured industrial tasks, while Green extends to remote and inspection scenarios.

Software Ecosystem
K2 Bumblebee runs Kepler OS, Linux-based and ROS compatible, with APIs for vision, motion, and voice, plus developer platforms like Kepler Studio. Green uses Linux-based OS with ROS 2 support and Python SDK. Both facilitate integration but K2 adds simulation tools.

Pricing & Value
K2 Bumblebee prices at $34,000-$40,000, offering 1.5x human productivity in industrial settings. Green ranges $50,000-$150,000, targeting broader applications. K2 provides lower entry cost for automation-focused deployments.

Safety Features
K2 Bumblebee includes emergency stop, obstacle avoidance, disturbance-resistant gait, and force feedback. Green features force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and redundant sensors. Both prioritize human-safe interaction in operational environments.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
13
K2 Bumblebee
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
5
Green
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | K2 Bumblebee | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying Capacity | 15 kg per arm | 15-25 kg per arm |
| Deadlift Capacity | 30 kg maximum (both arms combined) | 50-100 kg |
| Autonomy Level | Semi-autonomous with teleoperation and autonomous task execution | Semi-autonomous to fully autonomous |
| Price | $34,000 - $40,000 | $50,000 - $150,000 |
| Weight | 75 kg | 50-80 kg |
| Max Speed | 3 km/h (0.83 m/s) | 1.5-3 m/s (walking) |
| Runtime | 8 hours | 3-5 hours |
| Battery Pack | 2.5 kWh | 3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo |
| Dimensions | 175 cm x 60 cm x 50 cm | 170cm x 55cm x 38cm |
| Sensors | 3D cameras, fisheye vision cameras, tactile sensors (up to 25 per finger), six-axis force-torque sensors in wrists, inertial measurement units (IMUs), pressure sensors, torque sensors in joints, ultrasonic sensors (Estimated) | RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders |
Showing 10 of 53 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


K2 Bumblebee vs T800
Which robot wins? K2 Bumblebee vs T800 compared across speed, sensors, navigation, and price for industrial humanoid selection.


Optimus vs Green
Optimus or Green? Compare specs, navigation, battery, sensors, and speed performance.


AgiBot G2 vs Green
Head-to-head: AgiBot G2 vs Green. Explore differences in navigation, sensors, and battery.


Figure 03 vs K2 Bumblebee
Compare Figure 03 and K2 Bumblebee. Detailed analysis of navigation, battery, and sensors.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.