Cruzr S2 (UBT) vs Agibot A2 Lite (Agi)

Compare Cruzr S2 and Agibot A2 Lite. Detailed analysis of navigation, battery, sensors, mobility, AI, and software ecosystem.

Cruzr S2
UBTECH Robotics

Cruzr S2

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$50,000 - $150,000
vs
Agibot A2 Lite
AgiBot

Agibot A2 Lite

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$50,000 - $150,000

The Cruzr S2 by UBTECH Robotics is a humanoid robot positioned for diverse industrial and research applications. It offers a robust combination of mobility, perception, and safety features, making it suitable for manufacturing, logistics, and infrastructure inspection. Notably, the Cruzr S2 distinguishes itself with a taller stature and higher walking speed, as well as advanced control options including learned behaviors. Its flexible Linux-based OS and ROS 2 support further integrate it into complex robotics ecosystems.

The Agibot A2 Lite by AgiBot also targets manufacturing, research, and logistics sectors with its humanoid form. It stands out for a wider build and moderate walking speed, designed for balance-assisted locomotion and precise manipulation. Though sharing many sensor and control capabilities with the Cruzr S2, the Agibot A2 Lite emphasizes its interactive features and a standardized software environment with Python SDK support. Its competitive pricing and safety features position it as a versatile choice for industrial applications.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationCruzr S2Agibot A2 Lite
Price$50,000 - $150,000$50,000 - $150,000
Weight50-80 kg63 kg
Max Speed2 m/s0.5-0.8 m/s (walking)
Runtime3-5 hours2-2 hours
Battery Pack3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo14.4 Ah, 48V LiPo
Dimensions176cm x 55cm x 38cm169cm x 75cm x 30cm (H x W x L)
SensorsRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encodersRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders
Charging Time2-4 hours2-4 hours
Navigation SystemVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walkingVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walking
Control MethodTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviorsTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviors

Showing 10 of 50 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

The Cruzr S2 measures 176cm tall with a slender footprint of 55cm width, and weighs between 50 to 80 kg, allowing for a balance of agility and payload capacity. In contrast, the Agibot A2 Lite is slightly shorter at 169cm but broader at 75cm wide, weighing a steady 63 kg. This difference suggests Cruzr S2 favors a taller, narrower form factor, while Agibot A2 Lite provides a wider stance potentially aiding stability.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Mobility & Navigation

Trade-off

Cruzr S2 achieves a top speed of 2 m/s, surpassing Agibot A2 Lite's walking speed range of 0.5 to 0.8 m/s. Both robots utilize visual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, and balance-assisted walking to navigate complex environments autonomously or via teleoperation. The higher speed and weight range of Cruzr S2 imply greater dynamic mobility suited for faster operational tasks.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Sensors & Perception

Trade-off

Both robots are equipped with an identical suite of sensors including RGB and depth cameras, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, and joint encoders. This sensor array supports comprehensive 360-degree environmental awareness and force feedback for compliant manipulation. Consequently, their perception capabilities are comparable, enabling robust interaction with their surroundings.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

AI Capabilities

Trade-off

Each robot supports teleoperation, autonomous control, and learned behaviors, enabled by Linux-based operating systems and ROS 2 compatibility. Both provide Python SDKs for customization. The shared software foundation ensures they can execute complex tasks and adapt via AI, though specific implementations and performance may differ based on integration.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

Cruzr S2 and Agibot A2 Lite both feature battery lives of 3 to 5 years, indicating long-term operational stability. Their charging times are similar, ranging from 2 to 4 hours. Despite this parity, Agibot A2 Lite’s lower speed suggests potentially less power consumption during motion compared to Cruzr S2’s higher mobility.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

Both robots target manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations. Cruzr S2’s taller build and faster speed may favor tasks requiring quick traversal and dynamic interaction, while Agibot A2 Lite’s wider base and steady weight support potentially enhance stability for precise manipulation in confined or delicate environments.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Safety Features

Trade-off

Both robots implement comprehensive safety measures including force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and redundant sensors. These features ensure safe operation in human-shared environments and complex industrial settings, minimizing risks during autonomous or teleoperated tasks.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Software Ecosystem

Trade-off

The Cruzr S2 and Agibot A2 Lite both run Linux-based OS with ROS 2 support and provide Python SDKs, facilitating integration with existing robotic frameworks and AI modules. This commonality supports developers in adapting either platform to specific industrial workflows with familiar tools.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Pricing & Value

Trade-off

Both robots are priced within the $50,000 to $150,000 range, indicating competitive positioning in the humanoid robotics market. The choice between them likely reflects prioritization of mobility versus broader physical stability and manipulation capabilities, matched to the operational context.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

9

Cruzr S2

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

9

Agibot A2 Lite

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.