The Cruzr S2 by UBTECH Robotics is a humanoid robot positioned for diverse industrial and research applications. It offers a robust combination of mobility, perception, and safety features, making it suitable for manufacturing, logistics, and infrastructure inspection. Notably, the Cruzr S2 distinguishes itself with a taller stature and higher walking speed, as well as advanced control options including learned behaviors. Its flexible Linux-based OS and ROS 2 support further integrate it into complex robotics ecosystems.
The Agibot A2 Lite by AgiBot also targets manufacturing, research, and logistics sectors with its humanoid form. It stands out for a wider build and moderate walking speed, designed for balance-assisted locomotion and precise manipulation. Though sharing many sensor and control capabilities with the Cruzr S2, the Agibot A2 Lite emphasizes its interactive features and a standardized software environment with Python SDK support. Its competitive pricing and safety features position it as a versatile choice for industrial applications.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Cruzr S2 | Agibot A2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50,000 - $150,000 | $50,000 - $150,000 |
| Weight | 50-80 kg | 63 kg |
| Max Speed | 2 m/s | 0.5-0.8 m/s (walking) |
| Runtime | 3-5 hours | 2-2 hours |
| Battery Pack | 3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo | 14.4 Ah, 48V LiPo |
| Dimensions | 176cm x 55cm x 38cm | 169cm x 75cm x 30cm (H x W x L) |
| Sensors | RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders | RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders |
| Charging Time | 2-4 hours | 2-4 hours |
| Navigation System | Visual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walking | Visual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walking |
| Control Method | Teleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviors | Teleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviors |
Showing 10 of 50 specifications
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
The Cruzr S2 measures 176cm tall with a slender footprint of 55cm width, and weighs between 50 to 80 kg, allowing for a balance of agility and payload capacity. In contrast, the Agibot A2 Lite is slightly shorter at 169cm but broader at 75cm wide, weighing a steady 63 kg. This difference suggests Cruzr S2 favors a taller, narrower form factor, while Agibot A2 Lite provides a wider stance potentially aiding stability.

Mobility & Navigation
Cruzr S2 achieves a top speed of 2 m/s, surpassing Agibot A2 Lite's walking speed range of 0.5 to 0.8 m/s. Both robots utilize visual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, and balance-assisted walking to navigate complex environments autonomously or via teleoperation. The higher speed and weight range of Cruzr S2 imply greater dynamic mobility suited for faster operational tasks.

Sensors & Perception
Both robots are equipped with an identical suite of sensors including RGB and depth cameras, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, and joint encoders. This sensor array supports comprehensive 360-degree environmental awareness and force feedback for compliant manipulation. Consequently, their perception capabilities are comparable, enabling robust interaction with their surroundings.

AI Capabilities
Each robot supports teleoperation, autonomous control, and learned behaviors, enabled by Linux-based operating systems and ROS 2 compatibility. Both provide Python SDKs for customization. The shared software foundation ensures they can execute complex tasks and adapt via AI, though specific implementations and performance may differ based on integration.

Battery & Power Efficiency
Cruzr S2 and Agibot A2 Lite both feature battery lives of 3 to 5 years, indicating long-term operational stability. Their charging times are similar, ranging from 2 to 4 hours. Despite this parity, Agibot A2 Lite’s lower speed suggests potentially less power consumption during motion compared to Cruzr S2’s higher mobility.

Use-Case Suitability
Both robots target manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations. Cruzr S2’s taller build and faster speed may favor tasks requiring quick traversal and dynamic interaction, while Agibot A2 Lite’s wider base and steady weight support potentially enhance stability for precise manipulation in confined or delicate environments.

Safety Features
Both robots implement comprehensive safety measures including force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and redundant sensors. These features ensure safe operation in human-shared environments and complex industrial settings, minimizing risks during autonomous or teleoperated tasks.

Software Ecosystem
The Cruzr S2 and Agibot A2 Lite both run Linux-based OS with ROS 2 support and provide Python SDKs, facilitating integration with existing robotic frameworks and AI modules. This commonality supports developers in adapting either platform to specific industrial workflows with familiar tools.

Pricing & Value
Both robots are priced within the $50,000 to $150,000 range, indicating competitive positioning in the humanoid robotics market. The choice between them likely reflects prioritization of mobility versus broader physical stability and manipulation capabilities, matched to the operational context.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
9
Cruzr S2
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
9
Agibot A2 Lite
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


D7 vs Agibot A2 Lite
D7 or Agibot A2 Lite? Compare specs, navigation, battery, sensors, and real-world performance.


Walker S1 vs Agibot A2 Lite
In-depth comparison of Walker S1 by UBTECH and Agibot A2 Lite. Analyze navigation, battery, sensors, mobility, and AI.


Green vs Cruzr S2
Head-to-head: Green vs Cruzr S2. Explore differences in AI systems, mobility, and sensor suites.


D7 vs Cruzr S2
Compare D7 and Cruzr S2 humanoid robots by Pudu and UBTECH on mobility, manipulation, battery, and industrial use.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.