Walker S1 by UBTECH vs Agibot A2 Lite

In-depth comparison of Walker S1 by UBTECH and Agibot A2 Lite. Analyze navigation, battery, sensors, mobility, and AI.

Walker S1
UBTECH Robotics

Walker S1

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$50,000 - $150,000
vs
Agibot A2 Lite
AgiBot

Agibot A2 Lite

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$50,000 - $150,000

The Walker S1 by UBTECH Robotics is positioned as an advanced humanoid robot targeting industrial applications such as manufacturing, logistics, and infrastructure inspection. It distinguishes itself with a balance between robust build quality and versatile navigation capabilities, including visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping, supported by a Linux-based OS and ROS 2. Its operational speed ranges from 1.5 to 3 m/s, enabling efficient task execution in dynamic environments.

The Agibot A2 Lite by AgiBot offers a comparable humanoid form factor with a strong emphasis on stability and endurance, evidenced by a battery life of 3 to 5 years. While it exhibits a slower walking speed of 0.5 to 0.8 m/s, it shares similar sensor and navigation suites with Walker S1, relying on LiDAR and visual SLAM for environment mapping. Agibot A2 Lite supports teleoperation and autonomous controls within a Linux and ROS 2 ecosystem, positioning it as a reliable alternative for manufacturing and remote operation tasks.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationWalker S1Agibot A2 Lite
Price$50,000 - $150,000$50,000 - $150,000
Weight50-80 kg63 kg
Max Speed1.5-3 m/s (walking)0.5-0.8 m/s (walking)
Runtime3-5 hours2-2 hours
Battery Pack3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo14.4 Ah, 48V LiPo
Dimensions170cm x 55cm x 38cm169cm x 75cm x 30cm (H x W x L)
SensorsRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encodersRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders
Charging Time2-4 hours2-4 hours
Navigation SystemVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walkingVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walking
Control MethodTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviorsTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviors

Showing 10 of 50 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Walker S1 measures 170cm by 55cm by 38cm and weighs between 50 to 80 kg, showing some variability in configuration or payload capacity. In comparison, Agibot A2 Lite is slightly shorter and slimmer at 169cm by 75cm by 30cm and has a fixed weight of 63 kg. This suggests that Walker S1 may offer different build variants or modular flexibility, while Agibot A2 Lite maintains a more standardized physical profile.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Mobility & Navigation

Trade-off

Walker S1 exhibits higher walking speeds ranging from 1.5 to 3 m/s, which may enhance its efficiency in fast-paced industrial settings. Agibot A2 Lite moves at a slower pace of 0.5 to 0.8 m/s, potentially favoring stability over speed. Both robots implement advanced navigation techniques, including visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping, and employ balance-assisted walking to maintain stability in varied terrains.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Sensors & Perception

Trade-off

Both robots feature comprehensive sensor arrays including RGB cameras, depth cameras, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscopes, accelerometers, and joint encoders. This parity suggests equivalent capabilities in environmental perception, obstacle detection, and proprioception, facilitating navigation and task execution in unstructured or complex environments.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

AI Capabilities

Trade-off

Walker S1 and Agibot A2 Lite support teleoperation, autonomous operation, and learned behaviors, indicating advanced AI frameworks for decision-making and adaptation. Both utilize Linux-based OS with ROS 2 support and offer Python SDKs, enabling flexibility in software development and integration with AI models for robotics research and industrial automation.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

Agibot A2 Lite specifies a battery life of 3 to 5 years, implying strong endurance and suitability for long-term deployments without frequent replacement. Walker S1 does not publicly disclose battery specifications, though it is known for operational efficiency including balance-assisted walking and autonomous battery management. This lack of explicit data limits direct comparison but suggests differing approaches to power strategy.

Walker S1: +2
Walker S1

Use-Case Suitability

Winner 🏆 Walker S1

Both robots target manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations, showcasing broad applicability in industrial and service robotics sectors. Walker S1's higher speed and weight flexibility may cater better to dynamic environments requiring rapid task completion. Agibot A2 Lite's extended battery life favors deployments requiring minimal maintenance over extended periods.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Software Ecosystem

Trade-off

Each robot runs on Linux-based operating systems and supports ROS 2, with Python SDKs for customization. This commonality facilitates software development, simulation, and deployment across both platforms, allowing users to leverage established ROS tools and libraries for robotics applications.

Trade-off: +1 each
Agibot A2 Lite

Safety Features

Trade-off

Walker S1 and Agibot A2 Lite both incorporate force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop functions, and redundant sensors to ensure safe operations around humans and sensitive environments. This extensive safety suite is critical for industrial acceptance and operational reliability.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

9

Walker S1

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

7

Agibot A2 Lite

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.