The Walker S1 by UBTECH Robotics is a humanoid robot positioned for industrial applications, including manufacturing, logistics, and research. It features dimensions of 170cm x 55cm x 38cm and weighs 50-80 kg, enabling deployment in diverse environments. Key differentiators include semantic VSLAM navigation for improved spatial awareness and learning-based whole-body motion control for dexterous manipulation under high-load conditions.
The Kaleido 8.0 by Kawasaki targets similar industrial sectors like manufacturing, research, and remote operations. Its dimensions measure 180 cm × 55 cm × 38 cm with a weight of 80-86 kg, providing a slightly taller and heavier build. Differentiators encompass a claimed battery life of 3-5 years and identical sensor and navigation capabilities as Walker S1.
Detailed Analysis
Design & Build Quality
Walker S1 measures 170cm tall and weighs 50-80 kg, while Kaleido 8.0 stands at 180 cm with 80-86 kg. Both share identical width and depth at 55cm x 38cm. Walker S1 supports modular hardware for customization of limbs and end-effectors, whereas Kaleido 8.0 details on modularity are based on public demos.
Mobility & Navigation
Both robots achieve walking speeds of 1.5-3 m/s using balance-assisted walking. Navigation relies on Visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping for both models. Walker S1 incorporates semantic VSLAM for enhanced adaptability in dynamic industrial settings.
Sensors & Perception
Identical sensor suites include RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, and joint encoders. This configuration supports perception for navigation and manipulation tasks. No differences in sensor redundancy or types are specified.
AI Capabilities
Control modes match with teleoperation, autonomous operation, and learned behaviors. Walker S1 integrates large language model-based task planning and end-to-end AI for environment perception. Kaleido 8.0 sensor and control specs align but lack specified AI planning details.
Battery & Power Efficiency
Walker S1 battery details are not publicly disclosed. Kaleido 8.0 claims 3-5 years battery life, though feasibility in humanoid robotics remains unverified. Both address high-load operation challenges like joint cooling.
Use-Case Suitability
Shared use cases cover manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations. Walker S1 deploys in automotive assembly with AMRs and AGVs. Kaleido 8.0 matches these applications based on provided specs.
Software Ecosystem
Both utilize Linux-based OS, ROS 2 support, and Python SDK for development. This enables compatibility with standard robotics frameworks. No unique software features distinguish the platforms.
Safety Features
Safety systems are identical, including force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and redundant sensors. These ensure operation in human-shared environments. Both models prioritize industrial safety standards.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
9
Walker S1
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
7
Kaleido 8.0
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Walker S1 | Kaleido 8.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying Capacity | 15-25 kg per arm | - |
| Deadlift Capacity | 50-100 kg | - |
| Autonomy Level | Semi-autonomous to fully autonomous | - |
| Price | $50,000 - $150,000 | USD 50,000 - 150,000 - Based on the pricing of the similar models |
| Weight | 50-80 kg | 80 - 86 kg |
| Max Speed | 1.5-3 m/s (walking) | 1.5-3 m/s (walking) |
| Runtime | 3-5 hours | 3-5 hours |
| Battery Pack | 3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo | 3-5 kWh |
| Dimensions | 170cm x 55cm x 38cm | 180 cm × 55 cm × 38 cm- Based on the public demos |
| Sensors | RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders | RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders |
Showing 10 of 53 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution
Agibot A2 Lite vs Kaleido 8.0
Head-to-head: Agibot A2 Lite vs Kaleido 8.0. Explore differences in speed, dimensions, weight, sensors, and navigation capabilities.
KUAVO-MY vs Kaleido 8.0
Compare KUAVO-MY and Kaleido 8.0. Detailed analysis of speed, sensors, navigation, and battery life.
Walker S1 vs AgiBot G2
Walker S1 or AgiBot G2? Compare specs, sensors, navigation, speed, and real-world performance.
Walker S1 vs Walker Tienkung
Walker S1 or Walker Tienkung? Compare specs, navigation, sensors, and mobility performance.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.