The Walker S1 by UBTECH Robotics targets industrial and commercial applications such as manufacturing, logistics, and infrastructure inspection. It positions as a versatile humanoid platform with teleoperation, autonomous control, and balance-assisted walking for complex environments. Key differentiators include its speed range of 1.5-3 m/s, weight of 50-80 kg, and comprehensive sensors like RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, and force/torque sensors.
The Walker Tienkung by UBTECH Robotics serves research, education, scenario innovation, and industrial automation including rescue missions. It focuses on high-performance tasks with 42 degrees of freedom for human-like motion and multimodal interaction. Distinguishing features encompass 172 x 60 x 40 cm dimensions, 73 kg weight, 7 km/h speed, and sensors including stereo cameras, ultrasonic, and temperature sensors.
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
Walker S1 measures 170cm x 55cm x 38cm with a weight range of 50-80 kg, while Walker Tienkung is slightly larger at 172 x 60 x 40 cm and fixed at 73 kg. Both employ humanoid configurations optimized for balance and manipulation, with Walker S1 featuring force-compliant joints and Walker Tienkung offering 42 degrees of freedom for fluid motion. These designs support stable operation in industrial settings, though Walker S1's variable weight may indicate modular variants.

Mobility & Navigation
Walker S1 achieves 1.5-3 m/s walking speed using visual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, and balance-assisted walking, enabling stair climbing and agility. Walker Tienkung reaches 7 km/h with indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping for terrain adaptation including slopes. Both provide autonomous navigation, but Walker S1 adds teleoperation for remote operations.

Sensors & Perception
Walker S1 integrates RGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, and joint encoders for comprehensive environmental perception. Walker Tienkung includes RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, and temperature sensors. Walker S1 emphasizes force/torque precision, while Walker Tienkung adds stereo and ultrasonic for enhanced depth and proximity detection.

AI Capabilities
Walker S1 supports autonomous control and learned behaviors through Linux-based OS and Python SDK. Walker Tienkung relies on integrated AI for object manipulation, autonomous navigation, and human-robot collaboration using proprietary systems. Both leverage multimodal perception, but Walker S1 includes teleoperation alongside AI-driven decisions.

Battery & Power Efficiency
Walker S1 battery details remain undisclosed, limiting direct runtime comparisons. Walker Tienkung specifies a 3-5 year battery life, 3-hour runtime, and 2-hour charge time with a 30Ah + 3Ah pack. These metrics position Walker Tienkung for extended research deployments, while Walker S1's capabilities require further specification.

Use-Case Suitability
Walker S1 suits manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations with robust navigation and control options. Walker Tienkung targets scientific research, scenario innovation, logistics, rescue missions, and industrial automation emphasizing dexterous manipulation. Overlaps exist in logistics and research, but Walker S1 excels in remote tasks and Walker Tienkung in rescue scenarios.

Software Ecosystem
Walker S1 runs on Linux-based OS with ROS 2 support and Python SDK for custom development. Walker Tienkung uses ROS2 alongside proprietary software, Python, and C++ for advanced integration. Both ecosystems facilitate research and automation, with ROS2 enabling standardized interoperability.

Pricing & Value
Walker S1 pricing spans $50,000 - $150,000, accommodating varied configurations. Walker Tienkung ranges from $65,000 - $115,000, overlapping in mid-tier costs. Value derives from Walker S1's broader control modes and Walker Tienkung's specified battery longevity.

Safety Features
Walker S1 includes force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and redundant sensors. Walker Tienkung offers force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative mode. Both prioritize industrial safety, with Walker Tienkung's collaborative mode enhancing human-robot interaction.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
9
Walker S1
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
9
Walker Tienkung
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Walker S1 | Walker Tienkung |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying Capacity | 15 kg per arm (Stationary); 15 kg (Total while walking) | 1.5 kg |
| Deadlift Capacity | 50-100 kg | 3 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 41 DoF | - |
| Autonomy Level | Fully Autonomous (Goal-based with BrainNet coordination) | Fully autonomous, semi-autonomous |
| Price | USD 50,000 – 150,000 (Approx. for enterprise deployment; research-grade variants) | $65,000 - $115,000 |
| Weight | 76 kg (167.5 lbs) | 73 kg |
| Max Speed | 5.0 km/h (Running); Stable Walking: 3.0 km/h | 7 km/h |
| Runtime | 3-5 hours | 3 hours |
| Battery Pack | 2.0 kWh to 3.0 kWh (High-density Lithium-ion). | 30Ah + 3Ah |
| Dimensions | 172 cm (H) x 55 cm (W) x 38 cm (D) | 172 x 60 x 40 cm |
Showing 10 of 54 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


Walker S1 vs Kaleido 8.0
Compare Walker S1 and Kaleido 8.0. Detailed analysis of navigation, battery, sensors, and mobility.


Walker S1 vs AgiBot G2
Walker S1 or AgiBot G2? Compare specs, sensors, navigation, speed, and real-world performance.


AlphaBot 2 vs Walker Tienkung
Compare AlphaBot 2 and Walker Tienkung. Detailed analysis of navigation, battery, and sensors.


D7 vs Walker Tienkung
Compare D7 and Walker Tienkung. Detailed analysis of sensors, navigation, mobility, and battery life.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.