KUAVO-MY vs Green: Key Differences

Comparison of KUAVO-MY and Green humanoid robots highlighting AI systems, software ecosystems, and sensor capabilities.

KUAVO-MY
Leju Robotics

KUAVO-MY

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$50,000 - $150,000
vs
Green
Sberbank

Green

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$50,000 - $150,000

The KUAVO-MY by Leju Robotics is a humanoid robot designed for versatile commercial and research applications. It offers advanced AI integration, high-torque joints with 26 degrees of freedom, and adaptive bipedal locomotion suited for complex terrain and precise manipulation. Its Linux-based OS with ROS 2 and Python SDK support enables customization and integration in diverse environments. KUAVO-MY targets manufacturing, logistics, research, and remote operations with a focus on adaptive autonomy and safety.

Green by Sberbank is a humanoid robot developed with embedded artificial intelligence, demonstrated as Russia’s first physically embodied AI robot. It features a similar hardware profile to KUAVO-MY and integrates Sberbank’s GigaChat AI system for natural language interaction and continuous learning. Positioned for manufacturing, research, and infrastructure inspection, Green emphasizes AI-driven interaction and autonomous capabilities within a comparable hardware and software framework.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationKUAVO-MYGreen
Price$50,000 - $150,000$50,000 - $150,000
Weight50-80 kg50-80 kg
Max Speed1.5-3 m/s (walking)1.5-3 m/s (walking)
Runtime3-5 hours3-5 hours
Battery Pack3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo
Dimensions170cm x 55cm x 38cm170cm x 55cm x 38cm
SensorsRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encodersRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders
Charging Time2-4 hours2-4 hours
Navigation SystemVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walkingVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walking
Control MethodTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviorsTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviors

Showing 10 of 49 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Both robots share identical physical dimensions (170cm x 55cm x 38cm) and weight ranges (50-80 kg), reflecting humanoid form factors optimized for bipedal locomotion and manipulation. They feature robust construction to support carrying capacities of 15-25 kg per arm. The build quality appears consistent, focusing on durability and functionality for industrial and research use.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Mobility & Navigation

Trade-off

KUAVO-MY and Green both achieve walking speeds between 1.5 and 3 m/s, employing balance-assisted bipedal locomotion. Navigation systems use Visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping to enable autonomous path planning and environment mapping. Both platforms support teleoperation and learned behavior controls, facilitating flexible deployment in dynamic environments.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Sensors & Perception

Trade-off

Each robot is equipped with an extensive sensor suite including RGB cameras, depth cameras, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscopes, accelerometers, and joint encoders. These sensors provide comprehensive environmental perception for navigation, obstacle detection, and task execution. Sensor configurations and functionalities are effectively equivalent, supporting similar levels of situational awareness.

KUAVO-MY: +2
KUAVO-MY

AI Capabilities

Winner 🏆 KUAVO-MY

KUAVO-MY integrates advanced AI with imitation learning and supports mainstream large AI models, running on a Linux-based OS with ROS 2 and Python SDK. Green incorporates Sberbank’s proprietary GigaChat AI system, focusing on natural language processing and continuous learning. Both platforms enable autonomous and teleoperated control modes, but differ in AI system origins and interaction modalities.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

Both robots share battery specifications with 3-5 years of lifespan and runtime between 3 to 5 hours per charge. Charging times range from 2 to 4 hours, supported by 3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo battery packs. This parity suggests comparable operational endurance and downtime profiles suitable for extended deployment scenarios.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

KUAVO-MY and Green are designed for overlapping applications, including manufacturing, logistics, research, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations. Their similar hardware and software capabilities make them adaptable to complex environments requiring autonomous navigation and manipulation, with emphasis on safety and operational flexibility.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Software Ecosystem

Trade-off

Both robots operate on Linux-based systems with ROS 2 support, enabling integration with existing robotics middleware and tools. KUAVO-MY offers a Python SDK and cloud dashboard for remote monitoring and deployment, while Green leverages Sberbank’s AI platform for continuous learning and interaction. These software ecosystems facilitate customization and scalability for varied industrial and research needs.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Safety Features

Trade-off

Safety implementations are consistent across both robots, including force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop mechanisms, and redundant sensor arrays. These measures ensure safe operation alongside human workers and protect the robot hardware during unintended interactions or faults.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

9

KUAVO-MY

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

7

Green

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.