Optimus vs Figure 03: Key Differences
Compare Tesla Optimus and Figure 03 humanoid robots by design, AI, battery, and use-case suitability.

Optimus

Figure 03
Optimus by Tesla and Figure 03 by Figure AI are two leading humanoid robots competing in the emerging market of general-purpose autonomous assistants. Both target similar application domains such as elder care, domestic assistance, and light industrial tasks. Their development reflects increasing industry focus on robots capable of operating safely and effectively in human environments.
While both robots share a humanoid form factor, they differ in design priorities and operational focus. Optimus emphasizes integration with Tesla’s autonomous driving AI ecosystem and factory/manufacturing use cases, whereas Figure 03 is designed with home assistance and light object manipulation in mind, featuring a softer, more ergonomic build. Pricing and battery life also distinguish their market positioning.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Optimus | Figure 03 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $20,000–$30,000 | $50,000 - $70,000 |
| Weight | 57 | 45 kg (99 lbs) |
| Max Speed | 8.06 km/h (2.24 m/s) | 4.2 km/h (2.6 mph) |
| Runtime | 5 | 5 hours |
| Battery Pack | Custom high-capacity lithium-ion battery | 2 kWh |
| Dimensions | 173 x 50 x 30 | 167 cm x 60 cm x 50 cm (65.7 in x 23.6 in x 19.7 in) |
| Sensors | RGB cameras, stereo cameras, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, temperature sensors | Cameras (including palm camera), tactile fingertip sensors, mmWave data offload, multi-density foam for safety, audio system |
| Charging Time | Estimated 1–2 hours | 2 hours |
| Navigation System | Tesla FSD-based vision system, stereo cameras, internal proprioception | Vision-language-action AI with Helix system, SLAM, mmWave data offload for fleet learning |
| Control Method | Fully autonomous with optional remote supervision | AI autonomous control with voice command, remote monitoring, app integration |
Showing 10 of 50 specifications
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
Optimus features a taller and slimmer frame (173 x 50 x 30 cm) weighing 57 kg, optimized for factory and logistics environments. Figure 03 is slightly shorter but broader (167 x 60 x 50 cm) and lighter at 45 kg, with a design focus on safety and ergonomics, including multi-density foam padding and soft textile covering. Figure 03’s build emphasizes mass manufacturability and user-friendly aesthetics suitable for home use.

Mobility & Navigation
Optimus achieves a top speed of 8.06 km/h using Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD)-based vision system and internal proprioception, enabling autonomous navigation within complex environments like factories. Figure 03 moves slower at 4.2 km/h but benefits from a robust control system with vision-language-action AI and simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), supporting fleet learning and voice-command navigation. Both demonstrate agile locomotion but target different mobility profiles.

Sensors & Perception
Optimus incorporates RGB and stereo cameras, IMU, gyroscope, force, and temperature sensors to perceive its surroundings, leveraging Tesla’s extensive vehicle sensor expertise. Figure 03 adds tactile fingertip sensors, palm cameras, and mmWave data offload technology, enhancing its ability to interact delicately with objects and environments. The sensory suite of Figure 03 supports advanced safety and interaction in home settings.

AI Capabilities
Optimus runs on Tesla’s custom OS tightly integrated with its FSD AI, using years of driving data and simulation to support autonomous operation and skill acquisition. Figure 03 employs the Helix AI system based on ROS and Linux, designed specifically for humanoid tasks with vision-language-action modeling, allowing real-time environment understanding and adaptation. Tesla’s AI excels in perception and navigation, while Figure 03 focuses on task generalization and human-scale interaction.

Battery & Power Efficiency
Optimus offers approximately 8 hours of operational use on a single charge, suitable for a full workday in industrial settings. In contrast, Figure 03 boasts a significantly longer battery lifespan of 3-5 years, implying durable battery technology, though its daily operational runtime is shorter. Figure 03 supports wireless charging and optimized ergonomics to maintain high uptime in domestic environments.

Use-Case Suitability
Optimus is positioned for manufacturing, logistics, elder care, and domestic assistance, leveraging its speed and autonomous navigation for factory and warehouse efficiency. Figure 03 targets home assistance, household chores, elderly care support, light object manipulation, and cleaning, emphasizing safe interaction and adaptability. Their respective software and hardware designs reflect these distinct operational focuses.

Safety Features
Both robots include emergency stop functions and obstacle detection. Optimus employs compliant actuators to reduce injury risk in physical interactions. Figure 03 enhances safety with multi-density foam padding, soft textile coverings, pinch point protection, and tactile fingertip sensors, making it better suited for close human contact in home environments.

Software Ecosystem
Optimus runs Tesla’s proprietary OS integrated with the FSD AI stack, benefiting from Tesla’s vast data and simulation pipelines for rapid skill learning and deployment. Figure 03 uses the Helix AI system built on ROS and Linux, supporting Python and C++ APIs for flexibility, and incorporates vision-language-action learning tailored for humanoid tasks. Both ecosystems facilitate autonomous control with remote supervision capabilities.

Pricing & Value
Optimus is priced between $20,000 and $30,000, reflecting an accessible entry point into humanoid robotics with factory-grade AI integration. Figure 03’s higher price range of $50,000 to $70,000 corresponds to its advanced sensory suite, safety features, and home-focused design. The cost differences align with their target markets and intended deployment environments.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
6
Optimus
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
12
Figure 03
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


D7 vs Cruzr S2
Compare D7 and Cruzr S2 humanoid robots by Pudu and UBTECH on mobility, manipulation, battery, and industrial use.
NaN

AlphaBot 2 vs Cruzr S2
Compare AlphaBot 2 and Cruzr S2: similar specs, but AlphaBot 2 emphasizes embodied AI, 360° perception, and industrial task learning.
NaN

Walker S1 vs Green
Comparison of Walker S1 and Green humanoid robots focusing on AI, battery life, sensors, and industrial use cases.
NaN

LUS2 vs Martian
Comparing LUS2 and Martian humanoids: agility, speed, battery life, sensors, and use-case fit for industrial and service environments.
NaN