Optimus vs Figure 03: Key Differences

Compare Tesla Optimus and Figure 03 humanoid robots by design, AI, battery, and use-case suitability.

Optimus
Tesla

Optimus

⭐ Rating: 5.0/5
$$20,000–$30,000
vs
Figure 03
Figure AI

Figure 03

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$$50,000 - $70,000

Optimus by Tesla and Figure 03 by Figure AI are two leading humanoid robots competing in the emerging market of general-purpose autonomous assistants. Both target similar application domains such as elder care, domestic assistance, and light industrial tasks. Their development reflects increasing industry focus on robots capable of operating safely and effectively in human environments.

While both robots share a humanoid form factor, they differ in design priorities and operational focus. Optimus emphasizes integration with Tesla’s autonomous driving AI ecosystem and factory/manufacturing use cases, whereas Figure 03 is designed with home assistance and light object manipulation in mind, featuring a softer, more ergonomic build. Pricing and battery life also distinguish their market positioning.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationOptimusFigure 03
Price$20,000–$30,000$50,000 - $70,000
Weight5745 kg (99 lbs)
Max Speed8.06 km/h (2.24 m/s)4.2 km/h (2.6 mph)
Runtime55 hours
Battery PackCustom high-capacity lithium-ion battery2 kWh
Dimensions173 x 50 x 30167 cm x 60 cm x 50 cm (65.7 in x 23.6 in x 19.7 in)
SensorsRGB cameras, stereo cameras, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, temperature sensorsCameras (including palm camera), tactile fingertip sensors, mmWave data offload, multi-density foam for safety, audio system
Charging TimeEstimated 1–2 hours2 hours
Navigation SystemTesla FSD-based vision system, stereo cameras, internal proprioceptionVision-language-action AI with Helix system, SLAM, mmWave data offload for fleet learning
Control MethodFully autonomous with optional remote supervisionAI autonomous control with voice command, remote monitoring, app integration

Showing 10 of 50 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Figure 03

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Optimus features a taller and slimmer frame (173 x 50 x 30 cm) weighing 57 kg, optimized for factory and logistics environments. Figure 03 is slightly shorter but broader (167 x 60 x 50 cm) and lighter at 45 kg, with a design focus on safety and ergonomics, including multi-density foam padding and soft textile covering. Figure 03’s build emphasizes mass manufacturability and user-friendly aesthetics suitable for home use.

Trade-off: +1 each
Figure 03

Mobility & Navigation

Trade-off

Optimus achieves a top speed of 8.06 km/h using Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD)-based vision system and internal proprioception, enabling autonomous navigation within complex environments like factories. Figure 03 moves slower at 4.2 km/h but benefits from a robust control system with vision-language-action AI and simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), supporting fleet learning and voice-command navigation. Both demonstrate agile locomotion but target different mobility profiles.

Figure 03: +2
Figure 03

Sensors & Perception

Winner 🏆 Figure 03

Optimus incorporates RGB and stereo cameras, IMU, gyroscope, force, and temperature sensors to perceive its surroundings, leveraging Tesla’s extensive vehicle sensor expertise. Figure 03 adds tactile fingertip sensors, palm cameras, and mmWave data offload technology, enhancing its ability to interact delicately with objects and environments. The sensory suite of Figure 03 supports advanced safety and interaction in home settings.

Trade-off: +1 each
Figure 03

AI Capabilities

Trade-off

Optimus runs on Tesla’s custom OS tightly integrated with its FSD AI, using years of driving data and simulation to support autonomous operation and skill acquisition. Figure 03 employs the Helix AI system based on ROS and Linux, designed specifically for humanoid tasks with vision-language-action modeling, allowing real-time environment understanding and adaptation. Tesla’s AI excels in perception and navigation, while Figure 03 focuses on task generalization and human-scale interaction.

Figure 03: +2
Figure 03

Battery & Power Efficiency

Winner 🏆 Figure 03

Optimus offers approximately 8 hours of operational use on a single charge, suitable for a full workday in industrial settings. In contrast, Figure 03 boasts a significantly longer battery lifespan of 3-5 years, implying durable battery technology, though its daily operational runtime is shorter. Figure 03 supports wireless charging and optimized ergonomics to maintain high uptime in domestic environments.

Trade-off: +1 each
Figure 03

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

Optimus is positioned for manufacturing, logistics, elder care, and domestic assistance, leveraging its speed and autonomous navigation for factory and warehouse efficiency. Figure 03 targets home assistance, household chores, elderly care support, light object manipulation, and cleaning, emphasizing safe interaction and adaptability. Their respective software and hardware designs reflect these distinct operational focuses.

Figure 03: +2
Figure 03

Safety Features

Winner 🏆 Figure 03

Both robots include emergency stop functions and obstacle detection. Optimus employs compliant actuators to reduce injury risk in physical interactions. Figure 03 enhances safety with multi-density foam padding, soft textile coverings, pinch point protection, and tactile fingertip sensors, making it better suited for close human contact in home environments.

Trade-off: +1 each
Figure 03

Software Ecosystem

Trade-off

Optimus runs Tesla’s proprietary OS integrated with the FSD AI stack, benefiting from Tesla’s vast data and simulation pipelines for rapid skill learning and deployment. Figure 03 uses the Helix AI system built on ROS and Linux, supporting Python and C++ APIs for flexibility, and incorporates vision-language-action learning tailored for humanoid tasks. Both ecosystems facilitate autonomous control with remote supervision capabilities.

Trade-off: +1 each
Figure 03

Pricing & Value

Trade-off

Optimus is priced between $20,000 and $30,000, reflecting an accessible entry point into humanoid robotics with factory-grade AI integration. Figure 03’s higher price range of $50,000 to $70,000 corresponds to its advanced sensory suite, safety features, and home-focused design. The cost differences align with their target markets and intended deployment environments.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

6

Optimus

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

12

Figure 03

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs