Walker S1 vs KUAVO-MY: Key Differences

Compare UBTECH's Walker S1 and Leju's KUAVO-MY: mobility, terrain capability, payload, and real-world deployment differences in industrial humanoids.

Walker S1
UBTECH Robotics

Walker S1

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$$50,000 - $150,000
vs
KUAVO-MY
Leju Robotics

KUAVO-MY

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$$50,000 - $150,000

The Walker S1 by UBTECH Robotics is a full-scale humanoid robot designed for complex task automation in industrial and research environments. Positioned as a general-purpose platform, it combines advanced motion control, dexterous manipulation, and autonomous capabilities for manufacturing, logistics, and infrastructure inspection. Its key differentiators include a mature software stack with ROS 2 support, a well-documented sensor suite, and integration into large-scale deployments with major manufacturers.

KUAVO-MY by Leju Robotics is a humanoid robot engineered for all-terrain mobility and adaptive locomotion in challenging environments. Marketed as a rugged, terrain-capable platform, it emphasizes omnidirectional movement, high joint torque, and operation on sand, grass, and uneven surfaces. Its main differentiators are CTTL certification for industrial use, a lightweight design relative to its class, and specialized capabilities for outdoor and unstructured environments.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationWalker S1KUAVO-MY
Price$50,000 - $150,000$50,000 - $150,000
Weight50-80 kg50-80 kg
Max Speed1.5-3 m/s (walking)1.5-3 m/s (walking)
Runtime3-5 hours3-5 hours
Battery Pack3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo
Dimensions170cm x 55cm x 38cm170cm x 55cm x 38cm
SensorsRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encodersRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders
Charging Time2-4 hours2-4 hours
Navigation SystemVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walkingVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walking
Control MethodTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviorsTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviors

Showing 10 of 50 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
KUAVO-MY

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

The Walker S1 has a height of 172 cm and a weight range of 50–80 kg, with a bipedal structure optimized for human-centric industrial spaces. KUAVO-MY is reported at approximately 175 cm height and 45 kg, indicating a lighter, more agile build focused on mobility over raw payload. Both use industrial-grade materials and joint encoders, but KUAVO-MY’s lower mass supports higher agility and reduced impact in collisions, while Walker S1’s higher mass supports heavier payloads in structured environments.

Walker S1: +2
Walker S1

Mobility & Navigation

Winner 🏆 Walker S1

Walker S1 supports walking, running, jumping, and stair climbing with balance-assisted walking using LiDAR and visual SLAM. KUAVO-MY is designed for omnidirectional movement at 4.6 km/h and certified for adaptive locomotion on sand, grass, and uneven terrain. Both use LiDAR mapping and balance-assisted walking, but KUAVO-MY’s focus is on unstructured outdoor environments, whereas Walker S1 is optimized for structured indoor industrial and service settings.

Trade-off: +1 each
KUAVO-MY

Sensors & Perception

Trade-off

Both robots are equipped with RGB cameras, depth cameras, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscopes, accelerometers, and joint encoders. Walker S1 uses this suite for visual SLAM, environment perception, and real-time decision-making in manufacturing and logistics. KUAVO-MY leverages the same sensor types for terrain-adaptive navigation and industrial inspection in challenging outdoor conditions, with its perception stack tuned for dynamic, uneven surfaces.

Walker S1: +2
Walker S1

AI Capabilities

Winner 🏆 Walker S1

Walker S1 incorporates advanced AI for environment perception, real-time decision-making, and learned behaviors, with support for autonomous operation and teleoperation. KUAVO-MY runs on KaihongOS (based on OpenHarmony) and supports autonomous and learned behaviors, but its AI is specifically tuned for adaptive locomotion and terrain handling. Both platforms support learning from experience, but Walker S1’s AI is more oriented toward manipulation and industrial task automation, while KUAVO-MY’s emphasizes mobility robustness.

Trade-off: +1 each
KUAVO-MY

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

Walker S1 has a 3–5 kWh, 48V LiPo battery pack with a runtime of 3–5 hours and a charging time of 2–4 hours. KUAVO-MY’s battery is specified as lasting 3–5 years, but runtime and charging details are not publicly disclosed in the provided data. Walker S1’s power system is documented in terms of capacity and cycle life, while KUAVO-MY’s battery longevity is emphasized over per-charge endurance metrics.

Trade-off: +1 each
KUAVO-MY

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

Walker S1 is deployed in manufacturing, logistics, research, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations, with adoption by companies like BYD, Foxconn, and SF Express. KUAVO-MY is targeted at industrial applications on challenging terrains, including outdoor inspection, all-terrain logistics, and environments requiring adaptive locomotion. Walker S1 excels in structured, human-scale facilities, while KUAVO-MY is better suited for unstructured, outdoor, or rough-terrain industrial scenarios.

Trade-off: +1 each
KUAVO-MY

Functional Tools & Payload

Trade-off

Walker S1 has a carrying capacity of 15–25 kg per arm, suitable for material handling and assembly tasks in factories. KUAVO-MY has a peak joint torque of 360 Nm, enabling strong actuation for mobility and manipulation, but its per-arm payload is not specified in the provided data. Walker S1’s payload figures are explicitly defined for industrial use, while KUAVO-MY’s strength is reflected in joint performance rather than stated lifting capacity.

Walker S1: +2
Walker S1

Software Ecosystem

Winner 🏆 Walker S1

Walker S1 runs on a Linux-based OS with ROS 2 support, Python SDK, and interfaces including web app, CLI, ROS, and teleoperation joystick. KUAVO-MY uses KaihongOS based on OpenHarmony, which is designed for industrial IoT and edge computing, but specific ROS 2 or SDK details are not detailed in the provided specs. Walker S1 offers a more developer-accessible ecosystem with standard robotics tools, while KUAVO-MY’s software is oriented toward industrial integration and real-time control in harsh environments.

Walker S1: +2
Walker S1

Adoption & Real-World Deployments

Winner 🏆 Walker S1

Walker S1 has been adopted by major manufacturers including BYD, Geely, Foxconn, Dongfeng Liuqi, FAW Hongqi, and SF Express for factory automation and logistics. KUAVO-MY is CTTL certified for industrial applications and positioned for use in industrial inspection and outdoor operations, but specific large-scale customer deployments are not detailed in the provided information. Walker S1 has documented integration into large-scale industrial lines, while KUAVO-MY’s deployment evidence centers on certification and terrain capability rather than named enterprise customers.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

13

Walker S1

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

5

KUAVO-MY

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs