The Walker S1 by UBTECH Robotics is a full-scale humanoid robot designed for complex task automation in industrial and research environments. Positioned as a general-purpose platform, it combines advanced motion control, dexterous manipulation, and autonomous capabilities for manufacturing, logistics, and infrastructure inspection. Its key differentiators include a mature software stack with ROS 2 support, a well-documented sensor suite, and integration into large-scale deployments with major manufacturers.
KUAVO-MY by Leju Robotics is a humanoid robot engineered for all-terrain mobility and adaptive locomotion in challenging environments. Marketed as a rugged, terrain-capable platform, it emphasizes omnidirectional movement, high joint torque, and operation on sand, grass, and uneven surfaces. Its main differentiators are CTTL certification for industrial use, a lightweight design relative to its class, and specialized capabilities for outdoor and unstructured environments.
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
The Walker S1 has a height of 172 cm and a weight range of 50–80 kg, with a bipedal structure optimized for human-centric industrial spaces. KUAVO-MY is reported at approximately 175 cm height and 45 kg, indicating a lighter, more agile build focused on mobility over raw payload. Both use industrial-grade materials and joint encoders, but KUAVO-MY’s lower mass supports higher agility and reduced impact in collisions, while Walker S1’s higher mass supports heavier payloads in structured environments.

Mobility & Navigation
Walker S1 supports walking, running, jumping, and stair climbing with balance-assisted walking using LiDAR and visual SLAM. KUAVO-MY is designed for omnidirectional movement at 4.6 km/h and certified for adaptive locomotion on sand, grass, and uneven terrain. Both use LiDAR mapping and balance-assisted walking, but KUAVO-MY’s focus is on unstructured outdoor environments, whereas Walker S1 is optimized for structured indoor industrial and service settings.

Sensors & Perception
Both robots are equipped with RGB cameras, depth cameras, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscopes, accelerometers, and joint encoders. Walker S1 uses this suite for visual SLAM, environment perception, and real-time decision-making in manufacturing and logistics. KUAVO-MY leverages the same sensor types for terrain-adaptive navigation and industrial inspection in challenging outdoor conditions, with its perception stack tuned for dynamic, uneven surfaces.

AI Capabilities
Walker S1 incorporates advanced AI for environment perception, real-time decision-making, and learned behaviors, with support for autonomous operation and teleoperation. KUAVO-MY runs on KaihongOS (based on OpenHarmony) and supports autonomous and learned behaviors, but its AI is specifically tuned for adaptive locomotion and terrain handling. Both platforms support learning from experience, but Walker S1’s AI is more oriented toward manipulation and industrial task automation, while KUAVO-MY’s emphasizes mobility robustness.

Battery & Power Efficiency
Walker S1 has a 3–5 kWh, 48V LiPo battery pack with a runtime of 3–5 hours and a charging time of 2–4 hours. KUAVO-MY’s battery is specified as lasting 3–5 years, but runtime and charging details are not publicly disclosed in the provided data. Walker S1’s power system is documented in terms of capacity and cycle life, while KUAVO-MY’s battery longevity is emphasized over per-charge endurance metrics.

Use-Case Suitability
Walker S1 is deployed in manufacturing, logistics, research, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations, with adoption by companies like BYD, Foxconn, and SF Express. KUAVO-MY is targeted at industrial applications on challenging terrains, including outdoor inspection, all-terrain logistics, and environments requiring adaptive locomotion. Walker S1 excels in structured, human-scale facilities, while KUAVO-MY is better suited for unstructured, outdoor, or rough-terrain industrial scenarios.

Functional Tools & Payload
Walker S1 has a carrying capacity of 15–25 kg per arm, suitable for material handling and assembly tasks in factories. KUAVO-MY has a peak joint torque of 360 Nm, enabling strong actuation for mobility and manipulation, but its per-arm payload is not specified in the provided data. Walker S1’s payload figures are explicitly defined for industrial use, while KUAVO-MY’s strength is reflected in joint performance rather than stated lifting capacity.

Software Ecosystem
Walker S1 runs on a Linux-based OS with ROS 2 support, Python SDK, and interfaces including web app, CLI, ROS, and teleoperation joystick. KUAVO-MY uses KaihongOS based on OpenHarmony, which is designed for industrial IoT and edge computing, but specific ROS 2 or SDK details are not detailed in the provided specs. Walker S1 offers a more developer-accessible ecosystem with standard robotics tools, while KUAVO-MY’s software is oriented toward industrial integration and real-time control in harsh environments.

Adoption & Real-World Deployments
Walker S1 has been adopted by major manufacturers including BYD, Geely, Foxconn, Dongfeng Liuqi, FAW Hongqi, and SF Express for factory automation and logistics. KUAVO-MY is CTTL certified for industrial applications and positioned for use in industrial inspection and outdoor operations, but specific large-scale customer deployments are not detailed in the provided information. Walker S1 has documented integration into large-scale industrial lines, while KUAVO-MY’s deployment evidence centers on certification and terrain capability rather than named enterprise customers.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
13
Walker S1
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
5
KUAVO-MY
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Walker S1 | KUAVO-MY |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying Capacity | 15 kg per arm (Stationary); 15 kg (Total while walking) | 15-25 kg per arm |
| Deadlift Capacity | 50-100 kg | 50-100 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 41 DoF | 40–45 DOF across legs, arms, torso, and head |
| Autonomy Level | Fully Autonomous (Goal-based with BrainNet coordination) | Semi-autonomous to fully autonomous |
| Price | USD 50,000 – 150,000 (Approx. for enterprise deployment; research-grade variants) | $50,000 - $150,000 (enterprise and research humanoid platform pricing) |
| Weight | 76 kg (167.5 lbs) | 50-80 kg |
| Max Speed | 5.0 km/h (Running); Stable Walking: 3.0 km/h | 1.2-1.5 m/s (walking) |
| Runtime | 3-5 hours | 3–5 hours under active locomotion and manipulation |
| Battery Pack | 2.0 kWh to 3.0 kWh (High-density Lithium-ion). | 3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo |
| Dimensions | 172 cm (H) x 55 cm (W) x 38 cm (D) | Approx. 170 × 55 × 38 cm (standing humanoid form factor) |
Showing 10 of 54 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


KUAVO-MY vs Kaleido 8.0
Compare KUAVO-MY and Kaleido 8.0. Detailed analysis of speed, sensors, navigation, and battery life.


Walker S1 vs Kaleido 8.0
Compare Walker S1 and Kaleido 8.0. Detailed analysis of navigation, battery, sensors, and mobility.


Walker S1 vs AgiBot G2
Walker S1 or AgiBot G2? Compare specs, sensors, navigation, speed, and real-world performance.


Walker S1 vs Walker Tienkung
Walker S1 or Walker Tienkung? Compare specs, navigation, sensors, and mobility performance.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.