D7 by Pudu vs Green by Sberbank Robots

Compare D7 and Green humanoid robots by Pudu Robotics and Sberbank on AI, mobility, sensors, and software features.

The D7 by Pudu Robotics is a humanoid robot designed for diverse industrial and research applications, offering versatility through advanced manipulation and balance-assisted walking. Positioned in the mid-to-high price range, it integrates multiple sensors and supports autonomous and teleoperated control, targeting sectors like manufacturing, logistics, and infrastructure inspection. Its key differentiators include a Linux-based OS with ROS 2 support and flexible learned behaviors, making it suitable for complex operational environments.

Green by Sberbank is a humanoid robot developed for sophisticated task automation and real-world service applications, also priced between $50,000 and $150,000. This robot features similar dimensions and sensor arrays as the D7 but is distinguished by its integration with Sberbank’s GigaChat AI system, enabling natural language interaction and continuous learning. Green is positioned as a cutting-edge platform combining advanced motion control and AI, demonstrated publicly as Russia’s first humanoid with embedded artificial intelligence.

Share this comparison

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Both D7 and Green share identical physical dimensions of 170cm height, 55cm width, and 38cm depth, with weight ranges between 50 to 80 kg. Their humanoid form factors and construction support bipedal walking and manipulation tasks. The build quality reflects their industrial and research orientation, with robust sensors and actuators integrated for balance and dexterity.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Mobility & Navigation

Trade-off

Both robots achieve walking speeds between 1.5 to 3 meters per second, utilizing visual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, and balance-assisted walking for navigation. This allows them to operate autonomously or under teleoperation in complex environments, including manufacturing floors and infrastructure sites. Their locomotion systems enable stable movement over varied terrains.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Sensors & Perception

Trade-off

D7 and Green are equipped with comprehensive sensor suites including RGB and depth cameras, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscopes, accelerometers, and joint encoders. These sensors support precise environmental perception, object recognition, and real-time balance management, essential for autonomous operation and manipulation.

Green: +2
Green

AI Capabilities

Winner 🏆 Green

While both support autonomous and teleoperated control with learned behaviors, Green integrates Sberbank’s GigaChat AI system, which enables advanced natural language interaction and continuous learning. The D7 focuses on adaptable autonomous behaviors suitable for diverse industrial tasks but does not explicitly incorporate a proprietary conversational AI system.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

Each robot features a battery lifespan of 3 to 5 years with charging times estimated between 2 to 4 hours. Both utilize efficient power management systems capable of supporting extended operation cycles in industrial or research settings.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

Both robots are designed for manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operation tasks. The D7 emphasizes dexterous manipulation and balance for complex handling operations, while Green leverages AI-driven interaction and continuous learning to enhance automation in service and industrial environments.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Software Ecosystem

Trade-off

D7 and Green run on Linux-based operating systems with ROS 2 support and provide Python SDKs for customization. Green’s software is enhanced by Sberbank’s AI platform, enabling integration of conversational AI, whereas D7’s software focuses on flexible autonomy and teleoperation suited to varied robotic tasks.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Safety Features

Trade-off

Both robots incorporate force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop functions, and redundant sensors to ensure operational safety. These features are critical to preventing accidents during autonomous or teleoperated activities in dynamic industrial environments.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

7

D7

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

9

Green

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.

Technical Specifications

Head-to-head performance data and metrics

D7
Green

Functional Utility & Use Cases

4 Comparative Metrics

Control Method
Teleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviors
Teleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviors
Use Cases
Manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, remote operations
Manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, remote operations
Multi Robot Coord
Multi-robot coordination via network
Multi-robot coordination via network
Pet Friendly
Yes, with safety protocols
Yes, with safety protocols

Manipulation & Load Capacity

4 Comparative Metrics

Carrying Capacity
10 kg per arm
15-25 kg per arm
Deadlift Capacity
50 kg
50-100 kg
Payload Type
Tools, sensors, industrial equipment
Tools, sensors, industrial equipment
Modular Attachments
Tool changers, gripper interfaces, sensor mounts
Tool changers, gripper interfaces, sensor mounts

Kinematic Architecture & Dexterity

4 Comparative Metrics

Degrees of Freedom
30
-
Material
Aluminum frame, composite joints, polymer covers
Aluminum frame, composite joints, polymer covers
Mobility Type
Wheeled-based
Legged (bipedal walking)
Hardware Interface
USB-C, Ethernet, GPIO, CAN bus
USB-C, Ethernet, GPIO, CAN bus

Comparison Depth: 12 / 53 Metrics

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.