Figure 03 by Figure AI is a humanoid robot designed primarily for home environments, emphasizing advanced tactile sensing and pixel-to-action AI to perform household tasks like cleaning and elderly care support. It is positioned as a scalable, general-purpose home assistant with features such as a multi-camera vision system and soft textile safety covering. Key differentiators include its focus on delicate object manipulation, voice command integration, and a proprietary Helix AI system optimized for unpredictable home layouts.
Next‑Gen IRON by XPENG is a humanoid robot targeting broader industrial and commercial use cases including customer guidance, sales, and healthcare support. This model features a more robust sensor suite including LiDAR and stereo cameras, with a higher maximum speed and heavier payload capacity. Its proprietary ROS2-based software and autonomous plus teleoperation control modes set it apart as a more versatile platform for varied operational environments.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Figure 03 | Next‑Gen IRON |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50,000 - $70,000 | $150,000 - $250,000 USD (Estimated) |
| Weight | 45 kg (99 lbs) | 70 kg |
| Max Speed | 4.2 km/h (2.6 mph) | 6 km/h (1.67 m/s) max walking speed |
| Runtime | 5 hours | 6 hours on full charge (Estimated) |
| Battery Pack | 2 kWh | 2.5 kWh solid-state battery |
| Dimensions | 167 cm x 60 cm x 50 cm (65.7 in x 23.6 in x 19.7 in) | 178 x 50 x 40 cm |
| Sensors | Cameras (including palm camera), tactile fingertip sensors, mmWave data offload, multi-density foam for safety, audio system | RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, force sensors, temperature sensors, touch sensors embedded in skin |
| Charging Time | 2 hours | 2 hours |
| Navigation System | Vision-language-action AI with Helix system, SLAM, mmWave data offload for fleet learning | Visual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, indoor SLAM |
| Control Method | AI autonomous control with voice command, remote monitoring, app integration | Autonomous, teleoperation, learned behaviors |
Showing 10 of 50 specifications
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
Figure 03 measures 167 x 60 x 50 cm and weighs 45 kg, featuring soft textile coverings and multi-density foam for home safety and maneuverability in tight spaces. In contrast, Next‑Gen IRON is larger at 178 x 50 x 40 cm with a weight of 70 kg, built for industrial durability with force limiting and collision detection safety mechanisms. The lighter, padded design of Figure 03 suits domestic settings, while Next‑Gen IRON's sturdier frame supports heavier tasks.

Mobility & Navigation
Figure 03 moves at a speed of 4.2 km/h, equipped with vision-language-action AI, SLAM, and mmWave data offload to enhance navigation in dynamic home environments. Next‑Gen IRON offers faster movement at 6 km/h, utilizing visual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, and indoor SLAM for precise navigation in larger or more complex commercial spaces. Both robots rely on autonomous control, but Next‑Gen IRON extends capabilities with teleoperation and learned behaviors.

Sensors & Perception
The sensory suite of Figure 03 includes six cameras, a palm camera, tactile fingertip sensors, and an advanced audio system designed for detailed close-range task execution and speech reasoning. Next‑Gen IRON integrates RGB and stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic and force sensors, IMU, gyroscope, temperature, and embedded touch sensors, offering a broader sensory scope tailored for complex environment mapping and interaction.

AI Capabilities
Figure 03 employs the Helix AI system, a vision-language-action neural network that processes visual and linguistic inputs to generate physical actions, enabling advanced household task performance and conversational reasoning. Next‑Gen IRON runs a proprietary OS based on ROS2 supporting Python and C++ APIs, with autonomous, teleoperated, and learned behavior control modes, positioning it as a versatile platform for multiple sectors beyond home use.

Battery & Power Efficiency
Figure 03’s battery supports 3–5 years of life with a runtime around 5 hours and wireless charging capabilities optimized for home use. Next‑Gen IRON has a 4-year battery lifespan, with no specified runtime details, but its design suggests energy management suitable for intensive industrial or commercial tasks. Both prioritize safety features in battery design.

Use-Case Suitability
Figure 03 is tailored for home assistance including household chores, elderly care, and light object manipulation, focusing on environments requiring delicate interaction and safety. Next‑Gen IRON suits customer interaction, industrial inspection, sales assistance, and healthcare, designed for more physically demanding and diverse operational contexts.

Software Ecosystem
Both robots leverage ROS-based systems—Figure 03 uses Helix AI built on ROS and Linux for open API access in Python and C++, while Next‑Gen IRON operates on a proprietary ROS2 OS with similar API support. Figure 03 emphasizes continuous fleet learning via mmWave data offload, whereas Next‑Gen IRON supports teleoperation and learned behaviors to extend functional adaptability.

Safety Features
Figure 03 incorporates multi-density foam padding, soft textiles, emergency stop, obstacle avoidance, and pinch point protection for safe domestic use. Next‑Gen IRON includes force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative modes addressing safety in shared human-robot industrial environments.

Pricing & Value
Figure 03 is priced between $50,000 and $70,000, making it more accessible for home users seeking advanced tactile manipulation and conversational AI. Next‑Gen IRON ranges from $150,000 to $250,000, reflecting its industrial-grade sensors, faster speed, and versatile control modes geared toward commercial applications.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
6
Figure 03
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
12
Next‑Gen IRON
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


Optimus vs Next‑Gen IRON
In-depth comparison of Optimus by Tesla and Next‑Gen IRON by XPENG. Analyze navigation, battery, sensors, AI, and mobility.


Figure 02 vs Figure 03
Compare Figure 02 and Figure 03 humanoid robots on design, AI, sensors, battery life, and pricing for industrial vs home use.


Optimus vs Figure 03
Compare Tesla Optimus and Figure 03 humanoid robots by design, AI, battery, and use-case suitability.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.