Walker S1 vs Green: Key Differences

Comparison of Walker S1 and Green humanoid robots focusing on AI, battery life, sensors, and industrial use cases.

Walker S1
UBTECH Robotics

Walker S1

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$$50,000 - $150,000
vs
Green
Sberbank

Green

⭐ Rating: 4.0/5
$$50,000 - $150,000

The Walker S1 by UBTECH Robotics is a humanoid robot positioned for advanced industrial and research applications, notable for its focus on manufacturing, logistics, and infrastructure inspection. It emphasizes precise motion control and adaptable functionality, designed to improve productivity and worker safety in complex environments. Key differentiators include its comprehensive sensor suite and balance-assisted walking, although some performance challenges remain in uneven or cluttered settings.

Green by Sberbank is a humanoid robot tailored for complex task automation across similar sectors such as manufacturing and research but distinguishes itself with embedded AI capabilities powered by Sberbank’s GigaChat system. It supports natural language interaction and continuous learning, positioning it as a versatile platform for autonomous operations. Green also offers a long battery lifespan and advanced motion control, emphasizing real-time environmental awareness and communication.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationWalker S1Green
Price$50,000 - $150,000$50,000 - $150,000
Weight50-80 kg50-80 kg
Max Speed1.5-3 m/s (walking)1.5-3 m/s (walking)
Runtime3-5 hours3-5 hours
Battery Pack3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo
Dimensions170cm x 55cm x 38cm170cm x 55cm x 38cm
SensorsRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encodersRGB cameras, depth camera, LiDAR, IMU, force/torque sensors, gyroscope, accelerometer, joint encoders
Charging Time2-4 hours2-4 hours
Navigation SystemVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walkingVisual SLAM, LiDAR mapping, balance-assisted walking
Control MethodTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviorsTeleoperation, autonomous, learned behaviors

Showing 10 of 50 specifications

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

Both Walker S1 and Green share identical dimensions (170cm x 55cm x 38cm) and weight ranges (50-80 kg), reflecting similar humanoid form factors optimized for balance and stability. Their build quality supports bipedal locomotion with force/torque sensors and joint encoders to maintain precise movements. Green additionally offers color variants (white, gray, black), which may reflect customization options not specified for Walker S1.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Mobility & Navigation

Trade-off

Each robot achieves walking speeds between 1.5-3 m/s using balance-assisted walking combined with Visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping for navigation. Both platforms support autonomous and teleoperated control modes. Walker S1 has documented limitations in uneven terrain and cluttered environments, whereas Green’s motion control is supplemented by real-time balance adjustments and advanced AI for dynamic interaction.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Sensors & Perception

Trade-off

Walker S1 and Green both integrate a comprehensive array of sensors including RGB and depth cameras, LiDAR, IMU, gyroscopes, accelerometers, force/torque sensors, and joint encoders. This sensor fusion facilitates environment mapping, obstacle avoidance, and balance maintenance. Green’s sensor data supports AI-driven environmental awareness, enhancing perception for complex task execution.

Green: +2
Green

AI Capabilities

Winner 🏆 Green

Walker S1 supports learned behaviors and autonomous operation primarily through ROS 2 and a Linux-based OS, focusing on task adaptability in industrial scenarios. Green incorporates Sberbank’s GigaChat AI system, enabling natural language interaction, continuous learning, and more advanced autonomous decision-making. This AI integration allows Green to perform gestures, interact socially, and respond dynamically to voice commands.

Green: +2
Green

Battery & Power Efficiency

Winner 🏆 Green

Walker S1’s battery specifications are not publicly disclosed, limiting direct comparison. In contrast, Green provides detailed battery data including a runtime of 3-5 hours per charge, 2-4 hours charging time, and an overall battery lifespan of 3-5 years with a 3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo battery pack, indicating a focus on long-term operational efficiency.

Trade-off: +1 each
Green

Use-Case Suitability

Trade-off

Both robots are designed for manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations, supporting a range of industrial and service roles. Walker S1’s design emphasizes improving ergonomics and safety in manufacturing, while Green’s AI-driven interface and communication abilities enhance its suitability for interactive and dynamic environments requiring continuous learning.

Green: +2
Green

Software Ecosystem

Winner 🏆 Green

Walker S1 and Green both run on Linux-based operating systems with ROS 2 support and provide Python SDKs, facilitating integration and programming flexibility. Green’s additional AI platform (GigaChat) extends its software capabilities to include conversational AI and advanced task automation, which may offer a richer ecosystem for developing interactive applications.

Walker S1: +2
Walker S1

Safety Features

Winner 🏆 Walker S1

Both robots incorporate force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop functions, and redundant sensors to ensure safe operation around humans and in industrial settings. Walker S1, however, has noted challenges regarding safety in human-robot interaction, especially with unexpected impacts from the front or rear, suggesting areas for future improvement.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

6

Walker S1

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

10

Green

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs