The Walker S1 by UBTECH Robotics is a humanoid robot positioned for advanced industrial and research applications, notable for its focus on manufacturing, logistics, and infrastructure inspection. It emphasizes precise motion control and adaptable functionality, designed to improve productivity and worker safety in complex environments. Key differentiators include its comprehensive sensor suite and balance-assisted walking, although some performance challenges remain in uneven or cluttered settings.
Green by Sberbank is a humanoid robot tailored for complex task automation across similar sectors such as manufacturing and research but distinguishes itself with embedded AI capabilities powered by Sberbank’s GigaChat system. It supports natural language interaction and continuous learning, positioning it as a versatile platform for autonomous operations. Green also offers a long battery lifespan and advanced motion control, emphasizing real-time environmental awareness and communication.
Detailed Analysis

Design & Build Quality
Both Walker S1 and Green share identical dimensions (170cm x 55cm x 38cm) and weight ranges (50-80 kg), reflecting similar humanoid form factors optimized for balance and stability. Their build quality supports bipedal locomotion with force/torque sensors and joint encoders to maintain precise movements. Green additionally offers color variants (white, gray, black), which may reflect customization options not specified for Walker S1.

Mobility & Navigation
Each robot achieves walking speeds between 1.5-3 m/s using balance-assisted walking combined with Visual SLAM and LiDAR mapping for navigation. Both platforms support autonomous and teleoperated control modes. Walker S1 has documented limitations in uneven terrain and cluttered environments, whereas Green’s motion control is supplemented by real-time balance adjustments and advanced AI for dynamic interaction.

Sensors & Perception
Walker S1 and Green both integrate a comprehensive array of sensors including RGB and depth cameras, LiDAR, IMU, gyroscopes, accelerometers, force/torque sensors, and joint encoders. This sensor fusion facilitates environment mapping, obstacle avoidance, and balance maintenance. Green’s sensor data supports AI-driven environmental awareness, enhancing perception for complex task execution.

AI Capabilities
Walker S1 supports learned behaviors and autonomous operation primarily through ROS 2 and a Linux-based OS, focusing on task adaptability in industrial scenarios. Green incorporates Sberbank’s GigaChat AI system, enabling natural language interaction, continuous learning, and more advanced autonomous decision-making. This AI integration allows Green to perform gestures, interact socially, and respond dynamically to voice commands.

Battery & Power Efficiency
Walker S1’s battery specifications are not publicly disclosed, limiting direct comparison. In contrast, Green provides detailed battery data including a runtime of 3-5 hours per charge, 2-4 hours charging time, and an overall battery lifespan of 3-5 years with a 3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo battery pack, indicating a focus on long-term operational efficiency.

Use-Case Suitability
Both robots are designed for manufacturing, research, logistics, infrastructure inspection, and remote operations, supporting a range of industrial and service roles. Walker S1’s design emphasizes improving ergonomics and safety in manufacturing, while Green’s AI-driven interface and communication abilities enhance its suitability for interactive and dynamic environments requiring continuous learning.

Software Ecosystem
Walker S1 and Green both run on Linux-based operating systems with ROS 2 support and provide Python SDKs, facilitating integration and programming flexibility. Green’s additional AI platform (GigaChat) extends its software capabilities to include conversational AI and advanced task automation, which may offer a richer ecosystem for developing interactive applications.

Safety Features
Both robots incorporate force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop functions, and redundant sensors to ensure safe operation around humans and in industrial settings. Walker S1, however, has noted challenges regarding safety in human-robot interaction, especially with unexpected impacts from the front or rear, suggesting areas for future improvement.
Analysis Score Summary
Total Score
6
Walker S1
VS
Based on Detailed Analysis
Total Score
10
Green
📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each
Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Walker S1 | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying Capacity | 15 kg per arm (Stationary); 15 kg (Total while walking) | 15-25 kg per arm |
| Deadlift Capacity | 50-100 kg | 50-100 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 41 DoF | - |
| Autonomy Level | Fully Autonomous (Goal-based with BrainNet coordination) | Semi-autonomous to fully autonomous |
| Price | USD 50,000 – 150,000 (Approx. for enterprise deployment; research-grade variants) | $50,000 - $150,000 |
| Weight | 76 kg (167.5 lbs) | 50-80 kg |
| Max Speed | 5.0 km/h (Running); Stable Walking: 3.0 km/h | 1.5-3 m/s (walking) |
| Runtime | 3-5 hours | 3-5 hours |
| Battery Pack | 2.0 kWh to 3.0 kWh (High-density Lithium-ion). | 3-5 kWh, 48V LiPo |
| Dimensions | 172 cm (H) x 55 cm (W) x 38 cm (D) | 170cm x 55cm x 38cm |
Showing 10 of 54 specifications
Related Comparisons
Discover similar robot matchups to expand your knowledge and find the perfect solution


K2 Bumblebee vs Green
K2 Bumblebee or Green? Compare specs, sensors, navigation, speed, and battery performance.


Optimus vs Green
Optimus or Green? Compare specs, navigation, battery, sensors, and speed performance.


Walker S1 vs Kaleido 8.0
Compare Walker S1 and Kaleido 8.0. Detailed analysis of navigation, battery, sensors, and mobility.


AgiBot G2 vs Green
Head-to-head: AgiBot G2 vs Green. Explore differences in navigation, sensors, and battery.
Disclaimer
All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.