D9 by Pudu Robotics & Hoxo Robot by Orano And Capgemini

In-depth comparison of D9 by Pudu Robotics and Hoxo Robot by Orano And Capgemini. Analyze sensors, navigation, and battery performance.

The D9 by Pudu Robotics is a full-sized bipedal humanoid robot positioned for industrial automation, service robotics, research, healthcare, and warehouse logistics. Standing at 170 cm tall and weighing 65 kg, it features 42 degrees of freedom, a maximum walking speed of 2 m/s, and advanced visual semantic SLAM for navigation. Key differentiators include RGBD cameras, 12 tactile sensing areas with 1018 pixels, 275 TOPS computing power, and reinforcement learning for learned behaviors, enabling dexterous manipulation up to 20 kg payload.

The Hoxo Robot by Orano and Capgemini targets nuclear plant inspection, hazardous zone monitoring, and human-robot collaboration in industrial settings. With dimensions of 170 x 50 x 40 cm and weighing 80 kg, it offers a max walking speed of 1 m/s and 4-year battery life. It stands out with specialized sensors like stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, and gyroscope, alongside indoor SLAM navigation tailored for technical gesture execution in high-risk environments.

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Hoxo Robot

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

D9 measures 170 x 50 x 40 cm and weighs 65 kg, featuring 42 degrees of freedom for human-like movement and dexterous PUDU DH11 hands with 11 degrees of freedom and maximum joint torque of 352 N·m. Hoxo Robot matches dimensions at 170 x 50 x 40 cm but is heavier at 80 kg. Both employ humanoid proportions suited for industrial tasks, though D9's lighter build and higher degrees of freedom support greater agility.

D9: +2
D9

Mobility & Navigation

Winner 🏆 D9

D9 achieves a maximum walking speed of 2 m/s using visual semantic SLAM, LiDAR mapping, and real-time 3D mapping for obstacle navigation and terrain adaptation. Hoxo Robot reaches 1 m/s (3.6 km/h) with indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping focused on structured environments. D9's higher speed and semantic capabilities provide an edge in dynamic settings like warehouses.

Hoxo Robot: +2
Hoxo Robot

Sensors & Perception

Winner 🏆 Hoxo Robot

D9 integrates RGB cameras, RGBD cameras, tactile sensors across 12 areas with 1018 pixels, IMU, force sensors, and auditory sensors for comprehensive perception. Hoxo Robot uses RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, and force sensors. D9's tactile density and RGBD enable finer manipulation, while Hoxo's stereo and ultrasonic suit precise indoor localization.

D9: +2
D9

AI Capabilities

Winner 🏆 D9

Both robots support autonomous control, teleoperation, and learned behaviors, with D9 emphasizing reinforcement learning algorithms that improve from human demonstrations. D9 delivers 275 TOPS computing power for embodied intelligence tasks. Hoxo relies on proprietary AI modules without specified compute metrics, aligning AI for hazardous monitoring and gesture execution.

Trade-off: +1 each
Hoxo Robot

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

D9 offers a 3-5 year battery lifespan, while Hoxo provides 4 years. Specific capacity details for D9 include 15 Ah (0.72 kWh), supporting extended operations in service applications. Both designs prioritize long-duration performance for industrial use without frequent recharging.

D9: +2
D9

Use-Case Suitability

Winner 🏆 D9

D9 suits broad applications in industrial automation, healthcare assistance, warehouse logistics, and research with capabilities for stair navigation and 20 kg payload handling. Hoxo excels in nuclear inspections, hazardous monitoring, and technical gestures in controlled industrial zones. D9's versatility contrasts with Hoxo's specialization in high-risk, collaborative environments.

Trade-off: +1 each
Hoxo Robot

Software Ecosystem

Trade-off

Both utilize ROS2-based operating systems with proprietary AI software and APIs; D9 adds general programming integration, while Hoxo specifies Python and C++ APIs. This shared foundation enables custom development for automation tasks. Compatibility supports deployment across industrial and service sectors.

Trade-off: +1 each
Hoxo Robot

Safety Features

Trade-off

D9 and Hoxo both incorporate force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative modes for human-robot interaction. These features ensure safe operation in shared workspaces. Identical safety protocols align with industrial standards.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

10

D9

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

6

Hoxo Robot

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.

Specifications Comparison

SpecificationD9Hoxo Robot
Carrying Capacity10 kg per arm (Estimated half of combined 20 kg payload)5 kg per arm
Deadlift Capacity20 kg maximum10 kg
Degrees of Freedom-28
Autonomy LevelFully autonomous with teleoperation fallbackSemi-autonomous with teleoperation fallback
Price$150,000 - $250,000 (Estimated)USD150,000 - USD250,000
Weight65 kg80 kg
Max Speed2 m/s (7.2 km/h) max walking speed3.6 km/h (1 m/s) max walking speed
Runtime4 hours (Estimated based on similar humanoid robots)6 hours on full charge
Battery Pack2.5 kWh (Estimated based on runtime and power consumption of similar robots)3 kWh lithium-ion polymer
Dimensions170 x 50 x 40 cm (Estimated shoulder width and depth based on adult humanoid proportions)170 x 50 x 40 cm- Based on public Demo

Showing 10 of 54 specifications

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.