D9 by Pudu Robotics & Hoxo Robot by Orano And Capgemini

In-depth comparison of D9 by Pudu Robotics and Hoxo Robot by Orano And Capgemini. Analyze sensors, navigation, and battery performance.

The D9 by Pudu Robotics is a full-sized bipedal humanoid robot positioned for industrial automation, service robotics, research, healthcare, and warehouse logistics. Standing at 170 cm tall and weighing 65 kg, it features 42 degrees of freedom, a maximum walking speed of 2 m/s, and advanced visual semantic SLAM for navigation. Key differentiators include RGBD cameras, 12 tactile sensing areas with 1018 pixels, 275 TOPS computing power, and reinforcement learning for learned behaviors, enabling dexterous manipulation up to 20 kg payload.

The Hoxo Robot by Orano and Capgemini targets nuclear plant inspection, hazardous zone monitoring, and human-robot collaboration in industrial settings. With dimensions of 170 x 50 x 40 cm and weighing 80 kg, it offers a max walking speed of 1 m/s and 4-year battery life. It stands out with specialized sensors like stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, and gyroscope, alongside indoor SLAM navigation tailored for technical gesture execution in high-risk environments.

Share this comparison

Detailed Analysis

Trade-off: +1 each
Hoxo Robot

Design & Build Quality

Trade-off

D9 measures 170 x 50 x 40 cm and weighs 65 kg, featuring 42 degrees of freedom for human-like movement and dexterous PUDU DH11 hands with 11 degrees of freedom and maximum joint torque of 352 N·m. Hoxo Robot matches dimensions at 170 x 50 x 40 cm but is heavier at 80 kg. Both employ humanoid proportions suited for industrial tasks, though D9's lighter build and higher degrees of freedom support greater agility.

D9: +2
D9

Mobility & Navigation

Winner 🏆 D9

D9 achieves a maximum walking speed of 2 m/s using visual semantic SLAM, LiDAR mapping, and real-time 3D mapping for obstacle navigation and terrain adaptation. Hoxo Robot reaches 1 m/s (3.6 km/h) with indoor SLAM, visual SLAM, and LiDAR mapping focused on structured environments. D9's higher speed and semantic capabilities provide an edge in dynamic settings like warehouses.

Hoxo Robot: +2
Hoxo Robot

Sensors & Perception

Winner 🏆 Hoxo Robot

D9 integrates RGB cameras, RGBD cameras, tactile sensors across 12 areas with 1018 pixels, IMU, force sensors, and auditory sensors for comprehensive perception. Hoxo Robot uses RGB cameras, stereo cameras, LiDAR, ultrasonic sensors, IMU, gyroscope, and force sensors. D9's tactile density and RGBD enable finer manipulation, while Hoxo's stereo and ultrasonic suit precise indoor localization.

D9: +2
D9

AI Capabilities

Winner 🏆 D9

Both robots support autonomous control, teleoperation, and learned behaviors, with D9 emphasizing reinforcement learning algorithms that improve from human demonstrations. D9 delivers 275 TOPS computing power for embodied intelligence tasks. Hoxo relies on proprietary AI modules without specified compute metrics, aligning AI for hazardous monitoring and gesture execution.

Trade-off: +1 each
Hoxo Robot

Battery & Power Efficiency

Trade-off

D9 offers a 3-5 year battery lifespan, while Hoxo provides 4 years. Specific capacity details for D9 include 15 Ah (0.72 kWh), supporting extended operations in service applications. Both designs prioritize long-duration performance for industrial use without frequent recharging.

D9: +2
D9

Use-Case Suitability

Winner 🏆 D9

D9 suits broad applications in industrial automation, healthcare assistance, warehouse logistics, and research with capabilities for stair navigation and 20 kg payload handling. Hoxo excels in nuclear inspections, hazardous monitoring, and technical gestures in controlled industrial zones. D9's versatility contrasts with Hoxo's specialization in high-risk, collaborative environments.

Trade-off: +1 each
Hoxo Robot

Software Ecosystem

Trade-off

Both utilize ROS2-based operating systems with proprietary AI software and APIs; D9 adds general programming integration, while Hoxo specifies Python and C++ APIs. This shared foundation enables custom development for automation tasks. Compatibility supports deployment across industrial and service sectors.

Trade-off: +1 each
Hoxo Robot

Safety Features

Trade-off

D9 and Hoxo both incorporate force limiting, collision detection, emergency stop, and collaborative modes for human-robot interaction. These features ensure safe operation in shared workspaces. Identical safety protocols align with industrial standards.

Analysis Score Summary

Total Score

10

D9

VS

Based on Detailed Analysis

Total Score

6

Hoxo Robot

📊 Win: 2 points | Trade-off: 1 point each

Scores are summed across every insight: a clear winner earns 2 points, while balanced trade-offs give each robot 1 point. The total reflects how often each robot outperforms the other (or shares the spotlight) throughout the detailed analysis sections.

Technical Specifications

Head-to-head performance data and metrics

D9
Hoxo Robot

Functional Utility & Use Cases

4 Comparative Metrics

Control Method
Autonomous, teleoperation, learned behaviors via reinforcement learning
Autonomous, teleoperation, learned behaviors
Use Cases
Industrial automation, service robotics, research and development, healthcare assistance, warehouse logistics
Nuclear plant inspection, technical gesture execution, hazardous zone monitoring, human-robot collaboration in industrial settings
Multi Robot Coord
Yes, supports multi-robot coordination (Estimated)
Supports multi-robot coordination
Pet Friendly
Yes, with safety protocols
Yes, with safety protocols

Manipulation & Load Capacity

4 Comparative Metrics

Carrying Capacity
10 kg per arm (Estimated half of combined 20 kg payload)
5 kg per arm
Deadlift Capacity
20 kg maximum
10 kg
Payload Type
Tools, packages, precision instruments, human interaction
Tools, packages, precision instruments, human interaction
Modular Attachments
Tool changers, end-effector options including different hands and grippers
Tool changers, interchangeable end-effectors

Kinematic Architecture & Dexterity

4 Comparative Metrics

Degrees of Freedom
-
28
Material
Aluminum frame, composite and plastic coverings, soft materials in hand areas
Aluminum frame, composite panels, soft polymer coverings
Mobility Type
Legged (bipedal walking)
Legged (bipedal walking)
Hardware Interface
USB, GPIO, CAN bus, serial ports
USB, GPIO, CAN bus, serial ports

Comparison Depth: 12 / 54 Metrics

Explore More Comparisons

Discover more robot comparisons to find the perfect match for your needs

Disclaimer

All content, comparisons, and verdicts on this website are based on our research, testing, and opinion. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any information. Performance, specifications, and results may vary depending on usage and conditions. This website and its authors are not responsible for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information provided. Always verify product details with the manufacturer before making purchase or operational decisions.