Top 5 Humanoid Robots Compared by Energy Use: Battery, Runtime and Power (2026)
How We Compared Energy Use
Energy use decides whether a humanoid can finish a shift. We compared five leading robots using each maker's published battery capacity and runtime, dividing battery size by runtime to get average power draw, then by body weight so robots of different sizes can be compared. On that basis Tesla's Optimus draws the least per kilogram, about 5 W, followed by Figure 02 at 6.4 W, 1X's NEO at 7 W, Figure 03 at 7.5 W and Apptronik's Apollo at 8.6 W. These are averages over a working cycle, not peak draw.
What the Numbers Mean
Lower is not always better. NEO's 210 W is the smallest total draw because it is the lightest robot at about 30 kg and moves gently around homes. Figure 02 left BMW's Spartanburg plant in November 2025 after 11 months, and Figure 03 carries on with a 2.3 kWh pack and wireless inductive charging. Apollo draws the most of the five, but its hot-swappable pack lets operators replace a battery instead of waiting for a recharge. Battery chemistry and software change quickly, and these figures reflect spring 2026.
Quick Overview
Average draw is battery capacity divided by runtime; W/kg divides that by the robot's body weight. Lower numbers mean less energy per kilogram moved.
| Rank | Robot | Manufacturer | Key Strength | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Optimus | Tesla | 2.3 kWh, about 8 hours | 288 W (5.0 W/kg) |
| #2 | Figure 02 | Figure AI | 2.25 kWh, 5 hours | 450 W (6.4 W/kg) |
| #3 | Figure 03 | Figure AI | 2.3 kWh, 5 hours | 460 W (7.5 W/kg) |
| #4 | NEO Home Robot | 1X Technologies | 842 Wh, 4 hours | 210 W (7.0 W/kg) |
| #5 | Apollo | Apptronik | About 2.5 kWh, about 4 hours | 625 W (8.6 W/kg) |
Optimus uses the least power per kilogram, while NEO uses the least power in total.
Explore the Robots

Optimus
Tesla's Optimus has the lowest power draw per kilogram of the five, about 5 W for each kilogram of its 57 kg body. Tesla has said its 2.3 kWh, 52 V pack is sized for a full day of work, which works out to roughly 288 W on average over eight hours. Tesla designs its own actuators and battery electronics, drawing on its car business. If that efficiency holds in daily use, Optimus would need the fewest charging breaks of any robot here.

Figure 02
Figure 02 is Figure AI's second-generation humanoid, unveiled on August 6, 2024. Its 2.25 kWh battery sits in the torso and gives about five hours of continuous active operation, an average draw near 450 W, or 6.4 W per kilogram of its 70 kg frame. It carries 20 kg, has 44 degrees of freedom and five-fingered hands with 16 degrees of freedom, and runs a vision-language model on dual GPU modules. Figure retired it in November 2025 after an 11-month deployment at BMW's Spartanburg plant, so its numbers remain a useful benchmark for factory duty.

Figure 03
Figure 03 draws about 460 W on average: a 2.3 kWh battery spread across roughly five hours of use. That works out to 7.5 W per kilogram of its 61 kg body, more per kilogram than Figure 02, although the newer robot is lighter overall. Some of that power feeds features its predecessor lacked, such as palm cameras, tactile fingertips and a faster vision system. It also charges wirelessly through coils in its feet, which removes the need for a person to plug it in between runs.

NEO Home Robot
1X's NEO uses the least total power of the five, about 210 W on average: an 842 Wh battery divided by a four-hour runtime. At 7 W per kilogram of its roughly 30 kg body, it sits in the middle of the group. Low power use is a design choice for a household robot, since a smaller battery keeps the body light and quiet. NEO still has 75 degrees of freedom and a 70 kg deadlift, so the modest draw does not mean a weak machine. Pre-orders opened in October 2025.

Apollo
Apptronik's Apollo draws the most power of the five: its roughly 2.5 kWh hot-swappable battery lasts about four hours, an average near 625 W, or 8.6 W per kilogram of its 72.6 kg body. The trade-off is a different kind of endurance, because operators can swap a pack instead of waiting for a recharge. Its higher draw goes with a heavier frame and a 25 kg payload, so it works harder than the lighter robots here. Apptronik raised $520 million in February 2026 to scale up production.
Sources
- Optimus Profile
- Figure 02 Profile
- Figure 03 Profile
- NEO Home Robot Profile
- Apollo Profile
- CNBC: Tesla announces a humanoid robot, then called Tesla Bot, at its AI Day event
- Electrek: Tesla shows Optimus Gen 2 in a video, with faster walking, a lighter body and hands with
- TechCrunch: Figure AI unveils Figure 02, its second-generation humanoid, with onboard vision-language
- Figure AI: Figure introduces Figure 03 as its next-generation humanoid, designed for the home and for
- Figure 03: official specifications (Figure AI)
- The Robot Report: Figure AI raises more than $1 billion in a Series C round, lifting its valuation to $39
- NEO Home Robot: official specifications (1X Technologies)
- The Robot Report: 1X opens pre-orders for NEO at $20,000, or $499 a month by subscription, with deliveries
- Apollo: official specifications (Apptronik)
- Apptronik: Apptronik unveils Apollo, a 5 ft 8 in humanoid built for work alongside people in
Related Articles

Top 8 Humanoid Robots Built for Hazardous Environments
5/3/2026

Best AI-Powered Humanoid Robots for Hotels & Restaurants (2026)
5/3/2026

Top 6 Humanoid Robots with Advanced Voice Interaction Systems
5/3/2026

Top 8 Humanoid Robots Designed for Home Automation (2026)
4/20/2026

10 Humanoid Robots with the Best Hand Dexterity (2026)
4/18/2026

Top 7 Humanoid Robots for Security & Surveillance (2026)
4/18/2026

Humanoid Robots That Can Fold Laundry in 2026, Ranked by What They Really Do
10/30/2026

Waterproof and Dustproof Humanoid Robots in 2026, Ranked by IP Rating
10/29/2026

Tallest Walking Humanoid Robots in 2026, Ranked by Height and Weight
10/28/2026









